My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1936
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1936
>
CC MIN 1936
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/26/2016 11:55:41 AM
Creation date
8/26/2016 10:05:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/6/1936
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
193 <br /> MINUTES Or REGULAR MEETIXG <br /> REDWOOD CITY COUNCIL <br /> APRIL 20 , 1936 <br /> g : 00 P . M. <br /> Upon roll call , the following Councilmen were present : Mayor, C. G. Lambert , L . C. Christensen , <br /> J. M. Eva, E. A. Fletcher , R. Na Jones , P. A. McCarthy , Geo . W. McNulty and City Clerk, <br /> B. E. Myers . Absent : None, <br /> The minutes of the meeting of April 6 , 1936 , were approved on motion of Councilman Jones , <br /> seconded by Councilman McNulty. <br /> John Harkness . asked the Council whether or not it would be possible to obtain a refund of a <br /> $20 payment originally made to the City some years ago for a water meter . The matter <br /> was referred to the City Manager . <br /> Thos . Joaquin, for Montgomery Ward & Company , asked if it could be arranged that the company <br /> install a sprinkler system in its building to connect up with the Water Department mains <br /> without charge , with the understanding that whatever expense was incurred by the City <br /> connecting up with the sprinkler system would be paid by the company. Fire Chief Ryan <br /> advised that it was desirable to have such a sprinkler system as this building was one <br /> of the larger buildings in Redwood City. It was finally decided , on motion of Councilman <br /> Fletcher , seconded by Councilman Eva, to grant permission to make the connection as <br /> suggested, reserving the right to make a stand-by charge whenever the number of such <br /> systems would warrant a charge . <br /> George D. Van Tine , of the Murdock Motors Company , asked permission to set up a Pontiac <br /> Automobile Sales Room in the Gardiner Building , corner of Broadway and Wharf Street . <br /> He was given permission with the understanding that the drive-in should be from Wharf <br /> Street and that the business would be limited to a sales room. <br /> Larry Hausam, of the Shell Oil Company , asked for definite information concerning the set- <br /> back at the Shell corner of El Camino Real and Main Street . His request was referred <br /> to the City Attorney with instructions to take up the matter with the City Engineer . <br /> In connection with the request of George S . Paddleford , Inc . to be allowed to use the <br /> northerly corner of El Camino Real and James Street for a "used car" lot , a communi- <br /> cation was read from the Planning Commission indicating that the Planning Commission <br /> reserved its decision and made no definite recommendation. Al Davies , representing <br /> the established "new car" automobile dealers requested the Council , if it were possible , <br /> to take some action which would protect such dealers from outsiders coming in and <br /> setting up such sales outlets to get rid of their used. cars . The Clerk was instructed . <br /> to ask Mr. Paddleford, or a representative , to be present at the next regular meeting <br /> of the Council on May 4 before anything definite was done toward denying permission to <br /> use the lot indicated. <br /> In order to dispose of the claim of Mrs . D . D. London , on motion of Councilman McCarthy , <br /> seconded by Councilman Christensen , the claim was rejected. <br /> In order to dispose of the claim of Mrs . Lucile K. Gillis , on motion of Councilman <br /> Christensen , seconded by Councilman Jones , the claim was rejected. <br /> On motion of Councilman McNulty, seconded by Councilman Fletcher , Ordinance No . 372 , applying <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.