CC MIN 1933 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

filed September 18 , 1863 in Book " E" of Maps at page 77 , in the County Recorder ' s office of San Mateo County , California; thence from said point of beginning along said dividing line N. 86° 30 ' E . 185 . 00 feet ; thence across said Lot 8 , S . 3° 30 ' 1:1, 20 . 00 feet and S . 850 30 ' W. 185 feet to said easterly line of Jefferson Avenue ; thence along said easterly line N. 3° 30 ' W. A4 . 00 feet to the point of beginning . BEING a portion of said Lot S in Block 1 of Map of the Property in Villa Lots of J. V . Diller hereinabove mentioned , be and the same is hereby dedicated to public use as an alley. And be it further resolved that the Clerk of the City of Redwood City be and is hereby ordered and directed to record in the office of the County Recorder of San Mateo County, State of California , a certified copy of this resolution. Passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Redwood City at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3d day of April , 1933 , by the following vote : Ayes and in favor of the passage of the foregoing resolution, Councilmen: H . A. Beeger , C . J . Hildebrant , R . N. Jones , C . G. Lambert , G. W. McNulty , W . J . Duse1 . Noes and against the passage of the foregoing resolution. Councilmen : None Absent : P . A. McCarthy. WILLIAM J . DUSEL Mayor of the City of Redwood City Attest : B . E . MYERS Clerk of the City of Redwood City I hereby approve the foregoing resolution this 3d day of April , 1933 . WILLIAM J . DUSEL Mayor of the City of Redwood City Beryl Welch, a representative of Foster & Kleiser , asked permission to erect a posting panel 10 ' x 25 ' on the Cook property at the corner of Broadway and Main Streets . On motion of Councilman Beeger , seconded by Councilman Hildebrant , the request was granted. Julius Smith appeared before the Board concerning the alleged annoyance caused by the City ' s require- ment of a $100 deposit before new merchants could start business . The matter was referred to the City Manager and Attorney . The City Attorney explained that in consideration of the action of the Federal Congress in its beer legislation , it would seem advisable for the City to repeal its Ordinance No . 221 pertaining to the alcoholic content of beer . The Attorney stated that very likely the state would take over the control and regulation of the sale of beer and thought it best to wait with the state legis- lation had been put through . Accordingly , on motion of Councilman Beeger , seconded by Councilman Hildebrant , the Ordinance was introduced . (No . 342) Following the election of March 28 , the canvass of votes cast was publicly made at this meeting after affidavits of posting and publication had been presented and filed . The results , according to the various precincts were as follows :