My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-09-12 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-09-12 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/13/2016 11:52:14 AM
Creation date
9/12/2016 7:53:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/12/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
973
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
developer to construct such improvements prior to building permit final. The developer <br />anticipates completion of all project-related improvements by the end of 2018. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />Council may choose not to approve associated agreements for the project. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />There is no fiscal impact to the City as a result of this action. <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />The Zoning Administrator determined that the project is categorically exempt from the <br />requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15332 Class 32, <br />“Infill Development Project” because the project would not result in the significant effects <br />related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and can be adequately served by all <br />required utilities and public services. The Zoning Administrator also determined that the <br />offsite improvements are categorically exempt from the requirements of the CEQA <br />Guidelines per Section 15304 Class 4, “Minor Alterations to Land” because the <br />improvements consist of minor alterations in the condition of the land and do not involve <br />the removal of healthy, mature, scenic trees. No expansion or regrading of the existing <br />roadway is proposed. Approval of the related agreements and easements is not a <br />project under CEQA because such approval is an administrative action. <br /> <br /> <br />ALEX CHAN, EIT <br />PROJECT ENGINEER <br /> <br /> <br />AARON AKNIN, AICP <br />ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER/COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MELISSA STEVENSON DIAZ <br />CITY MANAGER <br /> <br /> <br />6.1.G. - Page 2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.