Laserfiche WebLink
City of Redwood City 2016 Public Health(9.A. - Page 11 <br /> Why Lead is Regulated? <br /> In 1974, Congress passed the Safe Drinking Water Act. This law requires the EPA to <br /> determine safe levels of chemicals in drinking water which do, or may cause, health <br /> problems. These are non-enforceable levels based solely on possible health risks and <br /> exposure. <br /> In 1995 the State of California adopted an Action Level of 15 ppb for lead, and requires the <br /> lead concentration in 90 percent of the water samples collected at customer taps not to <br /> exceed the Action Level. <br /> The California OEHHA revised the PHG for lead in drinking water from 2 ppb to 0.2 ppb on <br /> April 24, 2009, based on new studies relating to the most sensitive health risks. <br /> Since lead contamination generally occurs from corrosion of household lead pipes, it cannot <br /> be directly detected or removed by Redwood City. Instead, EPA requires water systems to <br /> control the corrosiveness of their water if the level of lead at home taps exceeds the Action <br /> Level. The AL for lead has been set at 15 ppb because the EPA believes, given present <br /> technology and resources, this is the lowest level to which water systems can reasonably be <br /> required to control the contaminant should it occur in drinking water at their customers <br /> home taps. <br /> Health Risks <br /> Lead has multiple toxic effects on human body. The OEHHA revised the PHG for lead in <br /> drinking water based on new studies relating to the most sensitive health risks. These are <br /> non-carcinogenic, chronic health effects including neurobehavioral effects (decreased <br /> intelligence) in children and hypertension in adults. Lead also has the potential to cause <br /> kidney disease and cancer; however, the carcinogenic risks are considered smaller than the <br /> risks for chronic toxicity. The public health goal of 0.2 ppb was determined from a maximum <br /> daily lead intake through water ingestion of 2.86 p.g/day, which corresponds to a level of <br /> concern for neurobehavioral effects (in children) designated as a decrease of one <br /> Intelligence Quotient point. <br /> Best Available Technology for Lead Elimination <br /> DDW considers optimizing corrosion controls as the BAT to deal with lead in drinking water. <br /> In an evaluation report dated August 4, 2006, the SFPUC concluded that pH adjustment in <br /> the San Francisco Regional Water System, which supplies water to Redwood City, is the <br /> optimal corrosion control treatment. The report, which was then approved by the DDW, <br /> recommends a minimum pH of 8.2 (i.e. the optimal water quality parameter, or OWQP) be <br /> maintained throughout the transmission and distribution system. Because Redwood City <br /> continues to meet the Action Level for lead and operate the water system with pH greater <br /> than 8.2, DDW considers that the City has achieved optimized corrosion control. Therefore, <br /> additional corrosion control treatment is not needed. <br /> 5 <br />