Laserfiche WebLink
This class of products started becoming popular in the Pacific northwest about 5 years <br />ago and that success and the cost effectiveness are helping to propagate this product <br />nationwide, especially along the west coast. The main attributes of this product over <br />natural turf are its ability to withstand heavy use without hardly any maintenance, and its <br />ability to drain storm water quickly, making it available almost 24/7. Obviously this field <br />uses no water, which is a major plus as well. <br />Currently, the two major suppliers of this class of product in the United States (US) are <br />FieldTurf and AstroPlay. Other suppliers exist, but are new to the US and have little <br />installed base. The suppliers are fiercely competitive, undoubtedly to establish market <br />share. Staff evaluated the two products very carefully and concluded that they are <br />distinctly different. It is recommended that the FieldTurf product be used for this project <br />even though deductive Bid Alternate "A" using AstroPlay can save $134,730 (or 9% of <br />construction cost). This recommendation is supported by the fact that the in-fill system <br />used by FieldTurf is a patented layer of cryogenic rubber particles and silicate sand <br />(non angular), which not only acts as a nonabrasive ballast to keep the blade vertical <br />without spreading easily, but also acts as a filter to stop rubber particles from migrating <br />into the drainage system. Furthermore, FieldTuff provides a finer, softer, and more <br />abundant grass blade that resembles natural grass. <br />This sport field is located at the corner of Spring and Charter Streets, and consists of <br />approximately 4.5 acres of turf area. The scope of work consists of: <br />~, removal of the top six inches (6") of existing soil and sod; <br />~' installation of a subdrainage system; <br />:~ installation of a layer of drain rock; <br />> installation of the synthetic turf system; <br />:~ installation or improvement of the fencing system; <br />~' installation of a minor amount of new natural turf and other landscaping <br />outside of the play field area, and <br />~* improvement of the overall irrigation system. <br />The project can start as soon as award of contract is made, and has a 110 days <br />construction schedule with an additional 60 days of landscape maintenance time. A <br />Field lighting system exists, and is not proposed to be improved. Other facilities in the <br />park are not affected by this project. <br />A bid opening was held on April 10, 2002, and seven bids were received. The bid <br />results are summarized below: <br /> <br /> No. Bidder Bid Amount <br /> 1. Robert A. Bothman, Inc., - San Jose, CA. $1,491,157.00 <br /> 2. Jensen Corporation-Cupertino, CA $1,513,080.00 <br /> 3. V3 Construction Group LTD - Woodridge, IL $1,573,937.22 <br /> 4. Valley Crest - Pleasanton, CA $1,612,677.25 <br /> 5. Goodland Landscape Const. Inc. - Livermore, CA $1,643,000.0.0_ <br /> 6. Beals Martin & Associates, Inc. - Redwood City, CA $1,719,299.11 <br /> 7. Zolman Construction and Dev., Inc. - San Carlos, CA $1,821,331.00 <br /> Average $1,624,926.00 <br /> <br /> -2- <br /> <br /> <br />