Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Clarence Cravalho, 1265 Vancouver Street, Burlingame, reiterated position <br />that Taco Bell promised not to pursue a drive through component at <br />this site. <br /> <br />In response to Council questions, Senior Planner Passanisi advised that in <br />that area restaurants do require Conditional Use Permits, which involve a <br />Public Hearing and possibility of conditions. <br /> <br />Council discussed the possibility of not requiring an EIR at this point in <br />the process, and sometime in the future having to consider an application <br />for a drive through component based on undue financial hardship and <br />precedent; discussed the purpose of an EIR which is to provide information <br />regarding traffic, noise, litter, etc.; and reiterated the question before <br />them was the decision to require an EIR and not the application by Taco Bell <br />for a fast food restaurant. <br /> <br />Mayor La Berge asked if anyone else wished to speak. <br />speak. <br /> <br />MIS: MurraYIStangel to close the Public Hearing. <br />Carried by unanimous voice vote and Hearing closed at 9:24 p.m. <br /> <br />No one wished to <br /> <br />M/S: Murray/Bury to reject appeal of Planning Commission decision to <br />require an EIR for the proposed fast food restaurant at 120 El Camino Real <br />with the following Findings: <br /> <br />FINDINGS: <br /> <br />1. An EIR is justified under the California Environmental Quality Act, <br />state guidelines and local guidelines implementive of that Act, with respect <br />to the necessity for Environmental Impact Reports for projects having the <br />potential to be controversial. <br /> <br />2. There are substantial indications that traffic, noise, light and <br />associated problems may have adverse environmental effects and should be <br />studied under the EIR process. <br /> <br />Carried by unanimous roll call vote. <br /> <br />MINUTE ORDER NO. 91-168 <br /> <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />Mayor La Berge declared at recess at 9:27 p.m. <br />Meeting reconvened at 9:40 p.m. <br /> <br />---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> <br />C. PUBLIC HEARING - to amend Section 2.5.2 (Accessory Dwellings) of the Redwood <br />City Zoning Ordinance. (201-03). Affidavit of Notice of Publication is on file. <br /> <br />REPORT: <br /> <br />Planning Commission, July 25, 1991 <br /> <br />Senior Planner Passanisi presented the staff report describing need to <br />adhere to state law and Redwood City General Plan. <br /> <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 50 <br />Page No. 331 <br /> <br />Regular Meeting Minutes <br />August 12, 1991 <br />Page 7 <br />