My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-08-23
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-08-23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:50:18 PM
Creation date
8/19/2004 1:45:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/23/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
131
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />:¡iA~B <br />Q: What happens in the event of a fiscal emergency? Will this measure tie the <br />legislature's hands in passing a budget or create more problems during the next state <br />fiscal crisis? <br />A: Prop 1 A was intentionally written to allow flexibilitv and provide the Governor and legislature <br />with options - but only in the event of a "significant state fiscal hardship". Under the provisions <br />of Prop 1A, beginning in 2008-09, if the Governor proclaims a "significant state fiscal hardship", <br />the Legislature may suspend the constitutional protection and may borrow local property taxes <br />only under following conditions: <br />· A separate urgency bill must be passed by a 2/3 vote of Legislature; <br />· The Legislature must pass a law to fully repay the loan with interest within 3 fiscal years; <br />· New loans are prohibited until prior loans have been repaid; <br />· No more than two loans may occur during any ten-year period; <br />· The loan amount is capped at 8% of local government property tax amount (equivalent <br /> of approximately $1.3 billion in today's property tax dollars); <br />While Prop 1 A contains flexibility in a state fiscal hardship, it also prevents the state from using <br />local government funds any time legislators choose. It also requires that future state reductions <br />be repaid in full. <br />Q: Will Prop 1A erode state funding for schools or education? <br />A: No. Prop 1 A was carefully written to ensure that it does not reduce funding for education or <br />schools by one dime. Under Proposition 98, schools are guaranteed a level of funding from the <br />state - and Prop 1A does not change that. <br />Q: Does Prop 1 A give more protection to local government than schools currently <br />receive? <br />A: NO. Under Proposition 98, schools are guaranteed a minimum amount of funding out of the <br />state general fund and Proposition 1A does not impact those protections at all. Further, <br />comparing the funding guarantees for schools with Prop 1 A is an apples-to-oranges protection. <br />Proposition 98 guarantees schools a specific amount of State General fund revenues. <br />Proposition 1A simply protects revenues that are LOCAL GOVERNMENT revenues, but that the <br />state has been taking for more than 12 years. <br />Q: What about other state programs? Will this measure reduce funding for state <br />programs like roads and prisons? <br />A: Prop 1 A simply prevents the state from raiding local revenues. The state still has flexibility <br />over its own revenues. <br />Q: Doesn't Prop 1Ajust add to the state's fiscal woes by initiating further "ballot-box- <br />budgeting" that puts restrictions on how it can spend its revenues? <br />A: No. The initiative does not tell the state how to spend the state's own revenues (as some <br />propositions have done). What it does is prevent the state from raiding local government <br />revenues for state purposes. This will mean that, for the first time in many years, local <br />communities will be have the certainty and predictability they need to plan and provide for <br />current and future service needs. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.