Laserfiche WebLink
<br />iA·q <br />Q: Will this measure prevent state fiscal reform efforts? <br />A: No. The first and most important step in reforming the troubled State-Local fiscal relationship <br />is to protect local government funding from continual state raids. Prop 1 A would accomplish this <br />important first step, while also leaving the door open for more comprehensive fiscal reform in <br />the future. Specifically, Prop 1 A would retain authority for the Legislature to approve the <br />exchange of local sales tax for an equal amount of property tax when requested by local <br />agreements. Any type of voluntary revenue exchange agreement must be revenue-neutral for <br />the impacted local governments. <br />Q: Does this measure increase revenues to local governments? <br />A: No. Prop 1A simply prevents the state Legislature from further reducing existing levels of <br />local government revenues. <br />Q: Why doesn't Prop 1A attempt to recollect lost ERAF property tax dollars? <br />A: Prop 1 A was intentionally drafted to draw a line in the sand and prevent future state <br />legislative raids of local government funding. While local governments and services are still <br />deprived by the ongoing state raid of property taxes, given the state of California's fiscal health, <br />we believe a more responsible approach at this time is to "stop the bleeding" at current levels. <br />Q: What happened to Proposition 65, which is also on the November ballot and attempts <br />to protect city, county and special district revenues from state raids? <br />A: Our coalition placed Proposition 65 on the ballot earlier this year, prior to the historic, <br />bipartisan July agreement that placed Prop 1A on the November ballot. After Prop 65 qualified <br />for the ballot, Governor Schwarzenegger approached our coalition and asked that we work with <br />him on an alternative local government protection measure. We agreed to provide the state <br />with short-term contributions from local governments to help the state out of its immense budget <br />problems, and the Governor agreed to work with the legislature to place Prop 1A on the ballot <br />and to actively campaign for passage of Prop 1A this Fall. Proposition 65 will continue to be on <br />the ballot, but all of the official sponsors of Prop 65 are now opposina 65 and supportinq ProP <br />1 A as a better, more flexible approach to protect funding for local governments and local <br />services. <br />Q: What happens if both Proposition 65 and Prop 1A pass? <br />A: Proposition 1A was written so that if it gains more votes than Proposition 65, it supersedes <br />Prop 65 in its entirety. Prop 1A contains language that specifically says that Prop 1A is a <br />"comprehensive and competing alternative" to Prop 65, and that "it is the intent of the people <br />that this measure supersedes in its entirety Prop 65", if Prop 1A gets more votes. <br />,.- ._, - -, ....,. _. ...-y-.'.......-----... <br />