My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1966 277-282.12 _ 8-22 cont. to 9-12-1966
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1966
>
1966 277-282.12 _ 8-22 cont. to 9-12-1966
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2017 11:39:43 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 8:14:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
4/4/1966
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
plus maintenance costs. Director of Public Works advised creek in its present <br />state could not handle amount of water anticipated. Councilman Bury felt report <br />should be made on usage of area proposed, should creek be covered. Councilman <br />Henderson stated she had toured area and would like a report on use of all spaces <br />in the park. Councilman Petersen asked that Staff report on what other land could <br />be purchased for the price differential in the creek improvements. <br />Doris Thompson, Secretary of Park and Recreation Commission, advised <br />Commission was adamant in their unanimous recommendation that creek be <br />covered and advised General Plan showed creek covered. She also re- <br />ported area to be gained if creek covered closer to 5 acres for park <br />purposes than the 3+ mentioned. She detailed further reason why <br />guniting and required fencing would present problems in park controls <br />for observation of activities. <br />Dr. Paul Young, President of Redwood City Civic Association, favored <br />Councilman Petersen's recommendation that perhaps cost of covering <br />creek could be more advantageously spent by purchase of other property <br />for park purposes. <br />Councilman Rosselli stated Community Park of over 34 acres not fully completed <br />after 14 years, and should reach point of completion. He felt other open space <br />needs would be covered when Mr. Winan's report submitted. Councilman Granger <br />asked a report also be made on Chestnut Park when this matter again discussed. <br />(Memo 9/13/66) <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5137 OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF <br />REDWOOD CITY FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY <br />REQUIRE THE ACQUISITION AND CONSTRUCTION BY THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY OF A <br />PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, NAMELY, CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS FOR PUBLIC DRAINAGE AND <br />WATERWAY PURPOSES INCLUDING THE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF LEVEES, IN <br />AND UPON THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED; THAT THE ACQUISITION <br />OF A RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS IN SAID REAL PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED IS <br />NECESSARY FOR SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, TOGETHER WITH CERTAIN RELATED ROADWAY <br />AND UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY HEREIN DESCRIBED; AUTHORIZING THE CITY <br />ATTORNEY TO BRING AN ACTION IN EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE SAID REAL PROPERTY <br />AND TO APPLY FOR AN ORDER OF IMMEDIATE POSSESSION OF SAID REAL PROPERTY; AND, <br />AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY MANAGER TO DEPOSIT MONEY FOR IMMEDIATE <br />POSSESSION OF SAID REAL PROPERTY. <br />City Attorney advised this one resolution covered the authority to acquire the <br />necessary property, together with authority to condemn. Staff report stated <br />this action was the first required step in the acquisition of property needed <br />to implement the ABC -District -Leslie agreements relating to Marine World. <br />Property included 19.83 acres from San Mateo County Scavenger Company for <br />waterway drainage easement and levee purposes, including 4.6 acres subject to <br />State tidelands ownership, and condemnation of roadway and utility easements <br />held by Scavenger Company and PGE. <br />Mr. Franco, of San Mateo County Scavenger Company, advised of their <br />Company's desire to cooperate with City but expressed their concern <br />over relinquishing their access rights of way and utility easements. <br />He stated they wished a definite commitment from City as to their <br />protection on these points, and that the present roadway would not <br />be torn up before the new one was built. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.