1967 Jan to Dec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

for its introduction if Committee would recognize any of the suggestions made at this meeting and make such amendments before introduction that were felt to be necessary, or that this introduction be continued for one week for a special re- view by Committee for this purpose. Councilman Bury advised most of the points discussed had been anticipated and studied by the Committee, but probably some should be reconsidered for eventual amendment, but if introduced as recommended now, the ordinance would not be pre- judiced for adoption. City Attorney advised it would be possible to introduce ordinance and at the time of adoption, amendments could be introduced if any considered necessary, which would become effective immediately thereafter. Councilman Granger again pro- tested action being taken for introduction at this time. City Attorney explained difficulties which would be presented on procedures of administration should ordinance not become effective and new schedule which would have to be arranged to avoid conflict with present ordinance. Councilman Petersen concurred with statements made concerning points which had been considered by the Committee and recommended Ordinance be adopted and recon- sidered for possible amendments thereafter, because of conflicts which would be presented, as previously stated, should ordinance not become effective at beginning of the new fiscal year. Councilman Henderson concurred with Councilman Petersen's statements, and again moved to introduce the ordinance, seconded by Councilman Keckley, who stated his reasons for introducing Ordinance were based on strong recommendation by the Committee, but indicated his questions concerned certain categories which he felt should be reconsidered for possible future amendment. Councilman Granger stated his lack of time to review ordinance thoroughly, but asked if Committee would review points brought out during discussion of this ordinance and report on their findings before considered by Council for adoption. Mayor Herkner re- quested copy of points raised during discussion of proposed ordinance be pre- sented to Committee Chairman. (Memo 5/23/67) Motion to introduce Ordinance carried on roll call vote. Mayor Herkner announced Mr. Glenn Smallcomb was present to make a contribution towards costs for opening of median barrier and signalization at Oak Avenue and E1 Camino, from the merchants involved in this proposal. Mr. Glenn Smallcomb presented two checks totaling $15,000 representing contribution to costs of this proposed opening of the median barrier and signalization by merchants involved, and stated it was his understanding that the plans for this work had been approved by the State and funds had been made available by the City for sharing costs also. City Manager stated the State had not yet approved the plans and specifications as sent to them with a request for encroachment permit for the construction work. City Attorney recommended that an agreement be prepared for Mr. Smallcomb's pro- tection covering use of the money which had been presented in case something should W 22 •67