1967 Jan to Dec - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

l 0 On question City Manager stated financing arrangements not discussed other than for storm drain which will come from bond funds. He further stated he had as late as this afternoon been in contact with the State trying to justify use of gas tax funds, State to pay 50% of signals at Hudson as agreement did not provide for reimbursement to City if City paid for construction now. He stated State Officer had indicated he would discuss this subject again tomorrow and that if this action is approved by Council it would be necessary to come back to Council for funding of project; therefore, resolution should be sub- ject to this subsequent action. City Attorney advised addendum to resolution not necessary, agreement just would not be signed. Councilman Henderson indicated her concern for not having had design of project presented for review and asked if it wasn't premature to go into this agreement until design presented. City Manager stated no design per se available at this time but State was willing to make a public presentation of plan and if Council so desired, will proceed on that basis. (Memo 1/24/67) Councilman Henderson also stated her concern for pedestrian crossings when Woodside is improved. City Manager advised State had already taken the posi- tion they would not participate in any overpasses on Woodside Road. After further discussion, motion carried on roll call vote. Councilman Keckley moved to introduce Ordinance appropriating $10,000 from unappro- priated balance of special gas tax street improvement fund to provide for - acquiring of land and construction of a pedestrian overpass across Woodside Expressway in vicinity of Stambaugh Street, seconded by Councilman Henderson. Councilman Petersen indicated he was voting no. Councilman Rosselli requested roll call vote be taken. Motion carried on roll call vote, Councilman Petersen voting no. General Improvement District 1-64 - Appraiser -Assessor. Report and recommendation of City Manager read advising one of the four actions needed to implement the Council's decision to retain a District Assessor for GIDl-64 was approval of an agreement for the services of a District Assessor. Recommendation now made to retain the firm of Marshall and Stevens, Inc., as Appraiser -Assessor for the GID 1-64 District. A full review was also made by him concerning work to be performed and inquiries ` made of this firm as to experience and background. Report stated fee for initial assignment shall not exceed $6500. He stated his recommendation had been con- curred in by DMJM, that this firm be retained on terms contained in the agreement proposed. (For full text see City Clerk's File - GID 1-64 District Appraiser - Assessor) City Manager stated he had also asked City Attorney to prepare a summary of other actions necessary to implement Appraiser -Assessor and which had been submitted to Council, but should also be read so those present could be informed in full