My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1967 Jan to Dec
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1967
>
1967 Jan to Dec
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/23/2017 2:54:19 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:54:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1967
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
456
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Clerk read the two alternate methods for computation of the number of employees <br />from the Business License Tax Ordinance and stated that in practice, any realtor doing <br />business in Redwood City was asked to pay the basic license of $25.00 plus a sum <br />representing the average number of employees working within the City of Redwood City. <br />Further discussion was held on how to compute the number of hours worked by employees <br />of realtors doing business in the city. City Clerk was questioned as to how informa- <br />tion had been submitted to business community prior to adoption of the ordinance and <br />procedures to be used for checking licenses. City Clerk advised informational bro- <br />chures and applications for new business licenses had been sent to all businesses of <br />record and that a field representative would explore the business field further for <br />those that might have been missed or had not voluntarily submitted information con- <br />cerning their business enterprise. <br />City Clerk also read a section in Ordinance 1316 which amended the basic business <br />license tax ordinance by reducing license fee for real estate agents, and which is <br />recommended by -Committee for an amendment to further clarify definition relating <br />to the broker's fee. <br />Mr. Wm. H. Royer explained how he interpreted computation of <br />employees by a, percentage basis rather than by numbercf hours, <br />which was further discussed as to merits of this application <br />on computation. <br />Carl Yearling, real estate broker in San Carlos, also requested <br />clarification on computation of employees and points discussed <br />on the percentage of his business operation in the City, in <br />addition to his basic brokerage license. <br />Wm. H. Royer expressed his appreciation for consideration which <br />had been extended to the realtors in reduction of license fee <br />for agents, but asked that consideration still be given to their <br />request that additional employees' fee be reduced from $10 to <br />$5, and reported on fees in other peninsula cities. <br />Councilman Bury reported all information submitted verbally at this discussion had <br />already been given consideration by the Committee and the decision had been made <br />to recommend real estate broker fees remain as adopted by the Ordinance. He also <br />stated it was proposed by the Committee to restudy and review operation of the Busi- <br />ness License Ordinance at the end of the first ninety day period of its operation. <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to accept recommendations of Committee and that Committee <br />should periodically continue its review. Motion seconded by Councilman Keckley and <br />carried, Councilman Granger voting no. (MINUTE ORDER #67-149) <br />REPORT OF BID OPENING, Woodside -Hudson signalization. The following bids were received: <br />Ecco -Phoenix Electric $143577.00 <br />Steiny & Mitchel 14,756.00 <br />Engineer's Estimate $15,000 <br />Staff recommended low bid of Ecco -Phoenix Electric Company be accepted in the amount <br />of $14,577.00. <br />Councilman Rosselli moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5416 AWARDING BID FOR CONSTRUCTION <br />OF WOODSIDE ROAD -HUDSON STREET SIGNALS AND CHANNELIZATION; REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS <br />RECEIVED; AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT THEREFOR, seconded by Councilman <br />Keckley and carried on roll call vote. <br />At 16 BT <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.