1968 339- 485 _ 1-8 to 4-15-1968

Browse Search

Mayor Sidney D. Herkner, and City Clerk Helen C. Moore. Also noted present were City Manager Howard C. Ullrich, Acting City Attorney David E. Schricker, Assistant City Manager Henry V. Burget, Deputy Police Chief Theodore Moudakas, Fire Chief J. L. Lodi, Planning Director Ken Schroeter, Deputy Director of Public Works Glenn M. Jain, Auditor -Accountant Jack Ference, Recreation Director A. S. Morton, Park Superintendent Pasco Balzarini, and Deputy City Clerk Marian McCrindle. Councilman Bury moved to approve Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 11, 1968, as mailed. City Clerk reported two corrections in the text; one in the tennis court item and one in the discussion held on Accounts Payable in Minutes of March 11, 1968, had been requested by Councilman Henderson. Councilman Bury moved to approve Minutes of Regular Meeting of March 11, 1968, as corrected, seconded by Councilman Henderson and carried. Continued PUBLIC HEARING, Application of LEO DEVELOPMENT COMPANY for a Planned Development Permit, under Article 46, Zoning Ordinance, as a portion of WINDSOR GARDENS, to allow the development of 18 townhouse units and a 36 -unit apartment building, located northwesterly side of Carlos Avenue on both sides of Leahy Street to Fox Court, 2.71 acre area (APN 59-162-22 and 59-166-02) in "R -2-P" and "R -3-P" Zoning Districts, declared open. It was noted this public hearing had been continued at Councils request from meeting of March 4th in order that Council might have additional time to review this matter and receive the additional material requested. Report of Planning Commission read in which action of the Commission, after a public hearing, resulted in their unanimously recommending that the Planned Development Permit be approved subject to the following conditions: (1) That the subject Planned Development Permit shall in- clude Block B. and that the conditions and exceptions pertaining to Blocks A and B, as approved in the afore- said PD67-02 and PD 65-01, be applicable to PD68-02. (2) That the subject permit shall apply to Block A and Block B regardless of future changes of ownership. (3) That the zoning district side yard requirements be met adjacent to the neighboring property for Lots 2 and 19, Block A. (4) That the final subdivision map be recorded prior to record- ing Planned Development Permit PD 68-02. (5) That Lot 1, Block A, be maintained as permanent common open space as stipulated in the deed restrictions as pre- viously approved by the Planning Commission at their meeting of June 22, 1965. Staff report and other review material concerning previous actions taken on this Planned Development Permit, which had been submitted to Council for re- view, was noted. Letter of protest against decision of Planning Commission, dated February 26, 1968, submitted by Leo Development Company, read in full In which specific points were protested regarding their not being allowed 1' setback on Lots/and 19, when overall setback would be greater than 5' average; detailing reasons for their believing plan as proposed by them would make for a more desirable Planned Development overall, and their intended allowable Option to re -arrange their planning if not granted the 1' setback requested, but which was not thought to be the best overall plan for development of their property. 44( 0 is"