My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
1968 339- 485 _ 1-8 to 4-15-1968
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1968 partial
>
1968 339- 485 _ 1-8 to 4-15-1968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/19/2016 3:29:55 PM
Creation date
12/19/2016 1:57:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/1/1968
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
482 <br />length of time, also in compliance with recommendation that it be located <br />within a developed area. He advised U. S. Coast & Geodetic Survey would <br />continue to maintain the instrument and make reports. Motion carried on <br />roll call vote, Councilman Keckley being noted absent. <br />Councilman Granger moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5662 APPROVING PLANS AND SPEC- <br />IFICATIONS FOR RESURFACING OF DESIGNATED STREETS; AND, AUTHORIZING CITY <br />CLERK TO CALL FOR BIDS THEREFOR, seconded by Councilman Rosselli. <br />Staff report stated plans and specifications had been prepared for the <br />resurfacing of the following streets, under the current budget in the <br />amount of $50,000: <br />Brewster Avenue Fulton Street to Alameda de las Pulgas <br />Connecticut Drive Hampton Avenue to Massachusetts Ave. <br />Hopkins Avenue Grand Avenue to Alameda de las Pulgas <br />Vera Avenue El Camino Real to Grand Street, and Iris <br />Street to King Street <br />Whipple Avenue Hudson Street to Alameda de las Pulgas <br />Optional bids are being requested for the following streets, <br />in case bids are favorable and within the budget: <br />Carson Street Roosevelt Avenue to Connecticut Dr. <br />Cleveland Street Jefferson Avenue to Vera Avenue <br />Councilman Bury questioned reason for apparent concentrated area for the <br />proposed resurfacing this year. City Manager advised this was the area <br />where a great deal of storm drain improvements had been made under the 1965 <br />bond issue, and, therefore, resurfacing had not been done in this area, but <br />streets could now be put back in order after being cut duringthese improve- <br />ments. Motion carried on roll call vote, Councilman Keckley being noted <br />absent. <br />Councilman Bury moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5663 ENDORSING RECOMMENDATIONS OF <br />MARINE AFFAIRS CONFERENCE, seconded by Councilman Henderson. Staff report <br />stated the Port Commission had requested the Council to endorse the Con- <br />ference's recommendations on the projects for this area, copies of which <br />had been submitted to Council for review. Motion carried on roll call <br />vote, Councilman Keckley being noted absent. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 5664 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR <br />APPRAISAL AND ACQUISITION NEGOTIATION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH STORM <br />DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT SD -21 (STULSAFT BRANCH), AND AUTHORIZING ITS <br />EXECUTION, seconded by Councilman Granger. <br />Acting City Attorney recommended that Gardner -Piercy & Company, Appraisers, <br />be retained for this work as they were well qualified and experienced in <br />this specialized appraising field, but also because of the number of ac- <br />quistion projects now being processed and need for an additional firm. <br />Councilman Petersen expressed concern that this project implied improve- <br />ments to be made in the Stulsaft Creek Branch area West of the Alameda <br />as Council had earlier made certain commitments to property owners that <br />creek would not be gunited as part of this storm drain improvements. City <br />Manager assured Council that commitments made to residents prior to this <br />bond issue election in this area were being maintained, as tributaries in <br />this area small and water flow relatively negligible, and before any im- <br />provements made a further review was intended. He advised Mr. Adamson <br />would present a report and recommendation for this area inthe near future. <br />AM 9 •86 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.