Laserfiche WebLink
369 <br />present, and other proposed change concerning Port Commission merely affected <br />language change to eliminate conflicting references. Councilman Petersen moved <br />to accept recommendation of Committee for changes proposed in Item II as stated, <br />seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #68-27B) <br />Item III. Amendments to Sections 35 and 58 concerning tax lien dates. <br />Councilman Bury advised change recommended in this section concerning tax lien <br />dates proposed for purpose of being consistent with lien date in State Code, <br />and that County has already changed their dates to coincide with State. Council- <br />man Petersen moved to accept recommendation of Committee for change proposed in <br />Item III as stated, seconded by Councilman Keekley and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #68-27C) <br />Item IV. Amendments to and repeal of Sections 82, 63 and 64 concerning <br />fund deposit and reporting. <br />Councilman Bury advise d this proposed change related to deposit of funds and <br />their reporting, which was intended to provide for better control. <br />City Manager advised proposed change was basically for bringing Charter into line <br />with present practices as Collector makes a diily detailed report to the Auditor <br />of all money collected from all Departments and other sources. Funds received <br />in Treasurer's office are also accounted for daily. <br />Mr. Swensen further explained that proposed change would <br />consolidate overlapping previous sections on this same <br />issue, would involve no extra work to that now being <br />practiced, besides allowing a little more leeway for re- <br />porting funds and save banking every day if monies re- <br />ceived not sufficient to warrant a deposit. <br />Councilman Petersen moved to accept recommendation of Committee for change <br />proposed in Item 1V as stated, seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried. <br />(MINUTE ORDER #67-27D) <br />Item V. Addition of Section ga to limit the permissible terms of <br />councilmen to four consecutive terms. <br />Councilman Bury advised this proposed recommendation to limit terms of council- <br />men to four consecutive terms had not received a unanimous recommendation of <br />the Committee. Councilman Keckley, a member of the Charter Committee, advised <br />that he had personally proposed this Charter change for several specific reasons <br />(1) felt it valuable for a growing City to permit easier involvement with new <br />people and ideas; (2) President and some Governors limited to specific terms of <br />office, and that under this specific proposal it would also be allowable if a <br />Councilman had to drop out because of term being ended, it would be permissible <br />to run for election again in two years. <br />He also pointed out reducing re-election for incumbents and vacancies coming up <br />periodically would tremendously increase candidates for Council. In any event, <br />it is felt this proposal would allow the citizens of our community to make their <br />decision. <br />im 22'68 <br />