Laserfiche WebLink
available to the Council. He advised Committee had already held two organiza- <br />tional type meetings, Bernard Nobler, being appointed Chairman, and are now ready <br />to go into the formal scheduled meetings. It was requested Council be sent Agen- <br />das and <br />Minutes of <br />this <br />Committee on a regular basis. <br />(Memo <br />1/9/68) Motion <br />Carried. <br />(MINUTE <br />ORDER <br />#68-6) <br />Councilman Henderson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 5582 ENDORSING THE POSITION OF THE <br />SAN MATEO COUNTY COUNCIL OF MAYORS IN OPPOSING THE APPLICATION OF WESTERN GREY- <br />HOUND LINES FOR FARE INCREASE AND ELIMINATION OF COMMUTATION FARES, seconded by <br />Councilman Keckley. <br />Staff report stated Resolution prepared by City Attorney at request of Council is <br />based on the same guidelines as the Resolution proposed by the Council of Mayors. <br />Councilman Petersen stated he was not opposed to a rate increase being proposed by <br />the Greyhound Lines commensurate with cost of living, etc., but is in opposition <br />to indicated increase proposed averaging 40% to 140% which seemed exorbitant. <br />City Manager pointed out that Resolution as prepared did not direct the Staff to <br />appear before the Commission in opposition to the proposed rate increase as had <br />been done in the SP case, but merely endorses resolution adopted by the Council <br />of Mayors. Councilman Bury also indicated his not being in opposition to any <br />reasonable rate increase. Motion carried on roll call vote. <br />Discussion of guidelines for Council's expense vouchers. <br />Mayor Herkner advised this discussion had been placed on the Agenda at the re- <br />quest of two Councilmembers. Councilman Keckley advised that he and Councilman <br />Bury had requested this item be discussed at this time and moved that all Council <br />expenditures over $10.00 be submitted within 30 days for approval by the Council <br />before the warrant for reimbursement is drawn. This motion was held up to permit <br />discussion. <br />Councilman Bury proposed an extension of the existing guidelines. He suggested <br />a line form be developed, to be the snap -put type with an original and two copies, <br />to be used by both Council and Staff. Original to the City Clerk for presentation <br />for approval; first copy to a permanent file; second copy to be retained by the <br />individual making the claim for reimbursement. <br />Mayor Herkner remarked that such a form had already been prepared in single copy <br />form, that it would be a simple matter to make it a snap -out form. <br />Councilman Petersen stated that in the past the City Council has determined early <br />in the year what expenses would be allowed for conferences and other meetings that <br />might come up. He suggested we should do like other cities and have a per diem <br />allowance, such as the State Assembly has. They are not required to turn in re- <br />cepits. It is too big a chore to keep the detailed records being talked about <br />now. He stated that in order to attend meetings on City business, he must take <br />time away from his job, which costs both himself and his company money. On a per <br />diem basis you would not have to go through the keeping of individual receipts <br />and recording them and turning them in. Making a mistake even one time results in <br />JAN 8V <br />