Laserfiche WebLink
346 <br />an embarassing situation. The per diem allowance protects both the City and the <br />Council, and he would prefer to have it that way. The State and the Federal <br />Government do not require receipts for the $25.00 per diem allowance. He stated <br />he would rather pay for any additional expenses over the $25.00 per diem allowance <br />than to obtain and turn in receipts for all expenditures. <br />Councilman Bury reponded that his proposal for a three-part form was not solely for <br />use in reporting conference expenses, but for any meeting. It would provide a con- <br />sistent basis of reporting. <br />Councilman Henderson stated she feels we should have rules which are enforceable; <br />the guidelines are not. She strongly recommended an ordinance containing a penalty <br />clause. She mentioned the "dangers of misappropriating City funds", and requested <br />the City Attorney be directed to prepare such an ordinance. She considered this <br />urgent, claiming there exists a "double standard". She further stated that since <br />the Council is considering a charter amendment affecting Council salaries, they <br />should reassure the public. She repeated that a penalty clause is needed, and <br />offered the following additions and changes to the guidelines: <br />1. Attach receipts for expenses greater than $10.00. <br />2. No future advances to be paid until an accounting <br />has been made for past advances. <br />3. Reduce the 400 miles to 100 miles for prior approval. <br />Councilman Granger suggested that questions about Council expenditures should be <br />brought to the Mayor's attention to thus avoid controversy. <br />Councilman Petersen moved that the Mayor and Vice -Mayor take into consideration <br />the comments of the Council members this evening, and come in with a report and <br />recommendation, seconded by Councilman Keckley and carried. (MINUTE ORDER #68-11) <br />Request of California Clippers for use of the Model Airplane Field as training field. <br />City Manager's report previously submitted to Council advised of the application <br />being made by this group for use of this property as a training field from January <br />1, 1968, through September 30, 1968, with a proposal for a $50 per month rental, which <br />City Manager had indicated seemed reasonable as turf conditions and general loca- <br />tion are less desirable than the Community Park field for which they had paid <br />$100 per month last year. He had also advised that the group had proposed the <br />possibility of using a mobile trailer for locker and conference room on the <br />property. He advised it was Staff's recommendation that if use of field is ap- <br />proved by Council, that use of locker and shower facilities at the adjacent County <br />Work Furlough facility be investigated. <br />He recommended that Council take two separate actions if use of the field is ap- <br />proved, since the Staff would not recommend use of a trailer unit if any other <br />locker facilities can be worked out. It was also noted, if arrangement is approved <br />for use of field, it would be subject to definite periods not in conflict with <br />model airplane field use. <br />Ja 8 '68 <br />