My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 1:00:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
12/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0— Environmental Settinz and Discussion oflmpacts <br />4.15 RECREATION <br />4.15.1 Existing Setting <br />Redwood City has over 30 parks and two outdoor poolS.36 One of the City's parks, Sandpiper Park, <br />is located on the project site. Sandpiper Park includes a synthetic turf athletic field, a play structure, <br />and a paved recreation area with a basketball court. An existing Joint Use Agreement between the <br />City and the District allows the District to use the Sandpiper Park facilities as part of school <br />operations and an after-school daycare program. Sandpiper Elementary School also includes <br />recreational facilities, including outdoor basketball courts, play structures, and a ball wall. <br />4.15.2 Environmental Checklist <br />RECREATION <br />Would the project: <br />Less Than <br />Potentially Significant Less Than <br />Significant With Significant <br />Impact Mitigation Impact <br />Incorporated <br />No Impact Beneficial Information <br />Impact Source(s) <br />1) Increase the use of existing ❑ ❑ ® ❑ ❑ <br />neighborhood and regional parks or <br />other recreational facilities such that <br />substantial physical deterioration of <br />the facility would occur or be <br />accelerated? <br />2) Does the project include recreational ❑ ❑ ® ❑ [] <br />facilities or require the construction <br />or expansion of recreational facilities <br />which might have an adverse <br />physical effect on the environment? <br />4.15.3 Recreation Impacts <br />4.15.3.1 Impacts to Recreational Facilities (Checklist Questions X — 2) <br />The proposed project would incrementally increase the student capacity of Sandpiper Elementary <br />School and, as a result, would incrementally increase the use of existing recreation facilities at the <br />school and Sandpiper Park. The incremental increase in demand and loss of existing parkland that <br />would be used to accommodate the proposed two-story classroom building, however, would not <br />substantially deteriorate or accelerate deterioration of the existing recreational facilities on the project <br />site. Additionally, the proposed project would improve the facilities at Sandpiper Park by adding a <br />36City of Redwood City. "Redwood City Parks, Recreation & Community Services: Parks." Accessed May 19, <br />2016. Available at: littv://www,redwoodeity.ore/der)artments/parks-recreation-and-communitv-ser-vices/t)arks. <br />City of Redwood City 85 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.