My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 1:00:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
12/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0— Environmental Setting and Discussion of Impacts <br />TRANSPORTATION <br />Less Than <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Less Than <br />No <br />Beneficial <br />Information <br />Significant <br />With <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Impact <br />Source(s) <br />Impact <br />I <br />Mitigation <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Would the project: <br />2) Conflict with an applicable <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,19 <br />congestion management <br />program, including, but not <br />limited to level of service <br />standards and travel demand <br />measures, or other standards <br />established by the county <br />congestion management agency <br />for designated roads or <br />highways? <br />3) Result in a change in air traffic <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />1 <br />patterns, including either an <br />increase in traffic levels or a <br />change in location that results in <br />substantial safety risks? <br />4) Substantially increase hazards <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />1,19 <br />due to a design feature (e.g., <br />sharp curves or dangerous <br />intersections) or incompatible <br />land uses (e.g., farm equipment)? <br />5) Result in inadequate emergency <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />1,19 <br />access? <br />6) Conflict with adopted policies, <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,19 <br />plans, or programs regarding <br />public transit, bicycle, or <br />pedestrian facilities, or otherwise <br />decrease the performance or <br />safety of such facilities? <br />4,16.3 Transportation Impacts <br />4.16.31 Thresholds of Significance <br />According to standard City practice, traffic impacts at a study intersection would be considered <br />significant if the project causes: <br />1, Operation at an unsignalized intersection to deteriorate from an acceptable level (LOS D or <br />better) to an unacceptable level (LOS E or F); or <br />2. The delay at an unsignalized intersection operating at an unacceptable level (LOS E or F) to <br />increase by five (5) or more seconds; and <br />City of Redwood City 93 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.