My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Reso PC16-23 PC 0116 Reso CEQA - Sandpiper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/3/2017 1:00:25 PM
Creation date
1/3/2017 12:05:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
Date
12/6/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Section 4.0—Environmental Setting and Discussion oflmpacts <br />turf field. Existing development in the project area includes one- and two-story, single- and multi- <br />family residences that are similar in appearance and of contemporary style. <br />4.1.1.2 State Scenic Highway <br />The project site is not located within a designated scenic vista or view corridor, and is not visible <br />from a designated scenic highway. The nearest officially designated state scenic highway is <br />Interstate 280, which is located approximately 4.75 miles southwest of the project site. 5 Sandpiper <br />Elementary School is not visible from Interstate 280 nor is the campus visible from a San Mateo <br />County designated scenic corridor.6 <br />4.1.2 Environmental Checklist <br />AESTHETICS <br />Less Than <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Less Than <br />No <br />Beneficial <br />Information <br />Significant <br />With <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Impact <br />Source(s) <br />Impact <br />Mitigation <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Would the project: <br />1) <br />Have a substantial adverse <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />[] <br />1,2 <br />effect on a scenic vista? <br />2) <br />Substantially damage scenic <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />1,4 <br />resources, including, but not <br />limited to, trees, rock <br />outcroppings, and historic <br />buildings within a state scenic <br />highway? <br />3) <br />Substantially degrade the <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1,2 <br />existing visual character or <br />quality of the site and its <br />surroundings? <br />4) <br />Create a new source of <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />® <br />❑ <br />❑ <br />1 <br />substantial light or glare which <br />would adversely affect day or <br />nighttime views in the area? <br />5 Caltrans, "California Scenic Highway Mapping System: Santa Mateo County." Accessed July 29, 2016. <br />Available at: httoa/www.dot.ca.eovlha/LandArch/16 livability/scenic hiehways/ <br />6 San Mateo County. San Mateo County General Plan: Scenic View Corridors. March 2010. <br />City of Redwood City 15 Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Sandpiper Elementary School Facilities Expansion November 2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.