My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-09 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 7:40:57 AM
Creation date
1/5/2017 6:17:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/9/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
608
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
windows or opaque <br />spandrel panels. Glass <br />should not be used as a <br />primary wall cladding <br />material. <br />123 2.9.3.F.2.c For Contemporary Building <br />Character Type: Wall <br />cladding may be brick, <br />stucco, wood, ceramic tile, <br />terra cotta, or metal. Glass <br />may be used as an accent <br />cladding material (e.g. a <br />vertical bay or the Building <br />Top may be expressed as a <br />curtain wall) but should not <br />cause its respective <br />Building Height Articulation <br />Component to exceed the <br />glazing limit set forth in <br />Section 2.8. Multiple <br />cladding materials may be <br />used within each Fagade <br />Height Articulation Element <br />or materials may vary from <br />element to element. <br />Glass is the primary wall <br />cladding material, and the <br />project exceeds the <br />glazing limit for the <br />Building Middle <br />Component. <br />.A. - Page 40 <br />Deny, as the <br />amount of glazing <br />utilized exceeds <br />the prescribed <br />ratio by too large <br />of an amount, thus <br />making glass the <br />primary wall <br />cladding material. <br />Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the regulations and <br />intent of the DTPP. The project meets all required Standards related to use, height, <br />setbacks, and architectural style. The five requested Guideline deviations would not, in <br />and of themselves, create any additional impacts, and in fact help to create a cohesive <br />and authentic Contemporary architectural design. Further, the proposed project would <br />not create a significant adverse impact on the adjacent historic resource. <br />Project Traffic Analysis <br />As part of the project -by -project environmental review, all applicants must submit a <br />Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA). The TIA examines how much traffic would be generated <br />from a specific development project, and how the traffic would distribute to nearby <br />intersections. The TIA then compares the results to the cumulative trip projections in <br />the DTPP EIR. Hexagon, a local transportation consulting firm hired by the Applicant, <br />submitted the TIA for the proposed 603 Jefferson Avenue development. The TIA <br />examined the following five intersections: <br />• Jefferson/Veterans <br />• Main/Veterans <br />• Main/Bradford <br />• Jefferson/Marshall <br />• Main/Marshall <br />The TIA describes the proposed Project as adding relatively little traffic to each of the <br />five nearby intersections, and the overall potential effect on traffic operations as being <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.