Laserfiche WebLink
TA. - Page 77 <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of X <br />value to the region and the residents of the State? <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource X <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use <br />plan? <br />Conclusion: Regarding mineral resources, the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental <br />impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15162(a)). All impacts are adequately evaluated in the certified Downtown Precise Plan program EIR. The proposed project <br />is also consistent with the Downtown Precise Plan (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183). <br />Documentation: <br />a. & b. No significant mineral deposits are identified in the DTPP area (DTPP program EIR p. 18-4). The project site <br />does not contain valuable or locally important mineral resources, nor will it consume extraordinary amounts of <br />mineral resources. Therefore, project implementation would not create an impact on mineral resources. <br />Summary of Impacts <br />Potentially <br />Less than Significant <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />With Mitigation <br />Significant <br />No <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Impact <br />Im act <br />XI. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: <br />a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of X <br />value to the region and the residents of the State? <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource X <br />recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use <br />plan? <br />Conclusion: Regarding mineral resources, the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental <br />impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section <br />15162(a)). All impacts are adequately evaluated in the certified Downtown Precise Plan program EIR. The proposed project <br />is also consistent with the Downtown Precise Plan (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183). <br />Documentation: <br />a. & b. No significant mineral deposits are identified in the DTPP area (DTPP program EIR p. 18-4). The project site <br />does not contain valuable or locally important mineral resources, nor will it consume extraordinary amounts of <br />mineral resources. Therefore, project implementation would not create an impact on mineral resources. <br />XII. NOISE — Would the project: <br />a) Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in X <br />the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other <br />agencies? <br />b) Expose persons to or generate excessive ground -borne vibration or ground- X <br />borne noise levels? <br />c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the X <br />project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />d) Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels X <br />in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has X <br />not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, <br />expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? <br />f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, expose people residing or X <br />working in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br />Conclusion: Regarding noise, the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts or a <br />substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)). All <br />impacts are adequately evaluated in the certified Downtown Precise Plan program EIR. The proposed project is also <br />consistent with the Downtown Precise Plan (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183). <br />Documentation - <br />a. & d. Noise in Redwood City is regulated by the City's Noise Ordinance (Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code). In <br />addition, the Noise Element of the City's General Plan enumerates noise policies. More specifically, excessive and <br />unreasonable noise levels are defined as noise levels generated by construction activities, including demolition, <br />alteration, repair or remodeling of existing structures, and construction of new structures, on property within the <br />30 <br />Summary of Impacts <br />Potentially <br />Less than Significant <br />Less than <br />Significant <br />With Mitigation <br />Significant <br />No <br />Impact <br />Incorporated <br />Impact <br />Im pact <br />XII. NOISE — Would the project: <br />a) Expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in X <br />the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other <br />agencies? <br />b) Expose persons to or generate excessive ground -borne vibration or ground- X <br />borne noise levels? <br />c) Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the X <br />project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />d) Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels X <br />in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has X <br />not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, <br />expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise <br />levels? <br />f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, expose people residing or X <br />working in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br />Conclusion: Regarding noise, the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental impacts or a <br />substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15162(a)). All <br />impacts are adequately evaluated in the certified Downtown Precise Plan program EIR. The proposed project is also <br />consistent with the Downtown Precise Plan (CEQA Guidelines Section 15183). <br />Documentation - <br />a. & d. Noise in Redwood City is regulated by the City's Noise Ordinance (Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code). In <br />addition, the Noise Element of the City's General Plan enumerates noise policies. More specifically, excessive and <br />unreasonable noise levels are defined as noise levels generated by construction activities, including demolition, <br />alteration, repair or remodeling of existing structures, and construction of new structures, on property within the <br />30 <br />