Laserfiche WebLink
� � - ll� <br /> • Family costs: Families also are fom,ed to suffes whm Sambliu8 bccomes a problam for a�ily <br /> member. Divorce, separation, spousal abuse, and child nep,l�t are some of the consequences <br /> sufferod by family members whea gambiing becomes aa addicctiaa. <br /> • Abused Dollars: This is ihe cost of all the money that is taken from £amily, frimds, aad e�mployas <br /> under faLse pretease to hetp support a gambler's addiction. <br /> Using a cost/benefit analysis of the above social costs, these eeonomists conciuded, "the costs <br /> of casinos aze at least 1.9 times greatcr tbaa the benefits". <br /> Local Government Loss of Control and cr m* acts on San iv�ateo <br /> After reviewing this subject at length, regardloss of one's personaI perspective of the <br /> cost/benefit of gaznbling and its impact on the comznunity, the loss of local control in <br /> decision malang is the fandarnentat concern of the passage of GRA. More and more <br /> frequenfly, local decision-maldng over local land use and planning issues has been taken <br /> away. The GRA is another signiftcant example of this erosion. <br /> IF the GRA, were successful, San Mateo wovld lose its local control to docide whether to pGrmit <br /> additional gambling in owr City. In November 1995. the voters of San Mateo defeated by a <br /> 60% majority the authorization of a 50-table card room at Bay Meadows. The measure was <br /> defeated �ven the voters concerns about th� impact of increased gamiag on the quality of life <br /> of the community. Regardless of the rcvcnue that would be derived, it was perceived the <br /> impacts did not justify the fenaacial benefits. <br /> The passage of the GRA might also frustrate the City's ability to achieve the vision of the extensive <br /> multi-year planning process to establish transit-oricntod development at this location. <br /> In addition, depending upon the amount of money that would eventually be generated from gambling at <br /> this location, the City couid find itself in a situation where we would have an unheaithy reliance on this <br /> source of funds to provide City senrices. The City has long held that a well-balanced diversification of <br /> revenue promotes financial stability. Other cities have run into diffroulties monit��g �� <br /> establishments when recognizuig that their financial livelihood (and many of the non-profits in the <br /> community) rely on the continued success of these businesses. <br /> Another concern from a practical perspoctive is that the bulk of the GRA will also become part <br /> of the State Constitution necessitaxing that any amendments would need to occur by a <br /> statewide vote on the ballot measure. Adding this detail in the constitution will lik�ely lead to <br /> problems in the future. <br /> Prononents and Oonc�ncnts• W�at aze th�v saving <br /> Proponents azgue that this initiativo wi11 require Indians to pay their "fair share" of the costs to California <br /> to operate a gambling monopoly in the State. The County Sheriffs of Los A.ngeles, San Matoo, and <br /> Sacramento endorse the initiative. <br /> Opponents azgue that the requirement to reach an agreement with all 61 tribes within the 90-day window <br /> is intentionally unachievable, aad that the real purpose of the GRA is to aIlow the 16 businesses to own <br /> and operate 30,000 new gaming devices in th� State. <br /> Governor Schwarzenegger opposes both the GRA and a competing gambling proposition to require <br /> Indian gaming tribes to be assessed at the corporate business tax rate. <br /> Page 6 <br />