My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-01-23 Closed and Joint
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-01-23 Closed and Joint
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2017 10:22:46 AM
Creation date
1/19/2017 3:58:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/23/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
645
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />9 <br /> <br />Summary of Tradeoffs Resulting from Two Approaches to Compliance with SB 415 <br /> <br />The two approaches to moving to even-year elections each involve tradeoffs between <br />important values, such as: <br /> <br />1. How quickly the approach results in even year elections, the goal of SB <br />415 in order to increase voter participation. <br /> <br />2. How much the approach costs, which impacts funding available for other <br />City priorities. <br /> <br />3. How much the approach varies from current community and Council <br />member expectations for Council member terms, which has raised <br />concerns for some community members. <br /> <br />The table below illustrates the tradeoffs present in each alternative, and also <br />summarizes how the approach affects the timing of Charter amendment and tax <br />measure considerations. It is important to note that the City alone does not control <br />whether an all mail election could be conducted. While costs are presented under both <br />scenarios, it is not known whether an all mail election would be feasible. <br /> <br />Election <br />Dates <br />All Even <br />Year <br />Elections <br />Achieved <br />Estimated <br />Cost <br />Variance <br />from <br />current <br />terms <br />Could Charter <br />amendment be <br />considered? <br />Could tax <br />measure be <br />considered? <br />Option A: <br />2018 and <br />2020 <br />Faster: 2020 Less costly: <br />>$64k for <br />each <br />polls/mail <br />election <br />(total cost <br />$128k) <br /> <br />>$51k for <br />each all mail <br />election <br />(total cost <br />$102k) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Varies <br />more; <br />increases <br />current <br />terms by 1 <br />year <br />Yes Yes <br />8.B. - Page 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.