Laserfiche WebLink
invoked and the buildings shut down. Property acquisition is a policy <br />matter that would need analyses of feasibility and citywide impacts. Mr. <br />Schricker also advised that currently there is no authority in our Code to <br />force owner who is responsible for violations to pay for staff response <br />time. If City goes to court under red light abatement, equity of <br />jurisdiction of the court could be invoked by the Court, but facts are <br />difficult to prove. Recurring health violations would at some point give <br />City authority to proceed on a general nuisance course of action which would <br />deal with the evidence of mismanagement, not the mismanagement itself. <br />Under the general police power, a City could enact a measure to provide cost <br />recovery under certain established standards, and Redwood City could break <br />new legal ground by enacting a law setting up a municipal receivership to <br />deal with these kinds of mismanagement, but policy and economic <br />ramifications would be tremendous. <br />The following people addressed the Council, described the deplorable <br />situation of the subject buildings and the gross and negative impacts on <br />their neighboring houses including garbage thrown onto their property, pest <br />infestation, burglarizing and vandalizing autos and homes, gunshots, drugs <br />and prostitution and asked Council to do something dramatic to once and for <br />all eliminate this health and neighborhood hazard: <br />Anna Palmer, 3431 Hoover Street, Redwood City <br />Deborah S. Crosby, 3443 Hoover Street, Redwood City <br />Barry/ , 3419 Hoover Street, Redwood City <br />Bonnie Miller, 1224 - 5th Avenue, Redwood City advised Council that there <br />are many good tenants in the buildings who are working hard to take care of <br />their apartments and to keep their plight in mind as Council works to <br />resolve this problem. <br />Tom Knecht, Redwood City Fire Inspector reported on the overcrowding in the <br />buildings, the resulting garbage and unacceptable living conditions and <br />asked Council to take aggressive action. <br />Council Members expressed outrage at the behavior of Reverend Graham and <br />that neighbors and tenants were forced to put up with such disregard for <br />human dignity. <br />CONSENSUS: It was determined by Mayor La Berge that it was the consensus of <br />the Council to request staff to prepare recommendations regarding the <br />following: a) every legal avenue available to the City to maintain low <br />income housing, but protect the larger community from the negative impacts <br />of such gross mismanagement; b) the purchase of the subject buildings by the <br />City or a non - profit agency; c) taking management away from Mr. Graham and <br />retaining an aggressive management firm; d) changing the Municipal Code to <br />force owners to pay for staff time spent on enforcement, in order to take <br />the profit out of ignoring orders to clean up and maintain adequate living <br />conditions; e) the possibility that the facts warrant red light abatement; <br />and f) the use of the Housing and Human Concerns Committee as a resource. <br />MINUTE BOOK NO. 49 <br />Page No. 316 <br />Reg. Mtg. Minutes <br />June 4, 1990 <br />Page 4 <br />