Agmt17 Clampett Industries LLC DBA EMG Corporation

Browse Search

Ranking and Classification Based upon Consultant's observations, research and judgment, along with consulting commonly accepted empirical Expected Useful Life (EUL) tables; Consultant will render an opinion as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement. Accurate historical replacement records provided by the facility manager are typically the best source for this data. Exposure to the weather elements, initial system quality and installation, extent of use, the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component. As a result, a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual age. The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age. • Currently Critics l(Immedful.) • Items in this category require immediate action and include a cited safely hazard, areas of accelerated deterioration, and return a building component to normal operation. • P.t.n11.11y Crflk.l(Your l) ' • Items in this category require colon in the next year and Include components experiencing Intermittent operations, poterelal life safety esues, rapid deterioration, and returning a building component to normal operation. '0• Necuss.ry—Nd Yet Critical (Years 2-3) 4 • Items in this category require appropriate attention to preclude predictable deterioration, potential dowraime, additional damage, energy efficiency projects and higher costs to remediation if deferred further. • Recommandd (Ye.n 4-5) • Items in this category represent a sensible Improvement to the existing conditions. These are not required for Ilse most basic function of the facility; however, Priority 4 projects will improve overall usability and/or reduce long-term maintenance costs. • Do.s not Meet Code./Sland.rds "G. Win hosed"' • Items in this category include Nems that do not conform to existing codes, butt are "grandfathered"intheircondgtom No action4 requiredot this lime, but should substantial work be undertaken in <ootiguoun areas, certain existing conditions might require action. The analysis will include all cost observations be ranked by Priority Classes. The five classes below are typical but can be altered to meet your specifications and needs: Priority 1: Currently Critical (Immediate): Requiring immediate action including a cited safety hazard and areas of accelerated deterioration, returning a building component to normal operation. Priority 2: Potentially Critical (Year 1): Requiring action in the next year including components experiencing intermittent operations, potential life safety issues, and rapid deterioration, returning a building component to normal operation. Priority 3: Necessary — Not Yet Critical (Years 2-3): Requiring appropriate attention to preclude predictable deterioration, potential downtime, additional damage, and higher costs to remediation if deferred further. Priority 4: Recommended (Years 4-5): Representing a sensible improvement to the existing conditions (not required for the most basic function of the facility; however, will improve overall usability and/or reduce long-term maintenance costs). Priority 5: Does Not Meet Current Code but "Grandfathered": No Action required at this time but should substantial work be undertaken correction would be required. The deficiencies observed will be classified into categories such as those below using the Uniformat System (up to 8 levels). Site Architectural Exterior Systems Exterior Finishes Life Safety Systems Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Systems Plumbing Systems Electrical and Service Distribution Systems REV: f1trFVAQR.2017.010/EMG Corp FCA Page 14 of 22