My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-09-27
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-09-27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 3:45:43 PM
Creation date
9/23/2004 1:24:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
9/27/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
329
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� �/ I � O <br /> Park and Recreation Activities <br /> This portion of the survey focused on the respondents who gave a rating of `Fair' or 'Poor' to the <br /> Recreation Opportunities provide by the Department. This question was left open ended and <br /> respondents were asked to give an explanation for their rating. Three significantly distinct <br /> responses were gathered from the respondents. Six-teen percent (16%) of respondents indicating <br /> that they felt there were 'Not enough suitable parks', 12 percent said `Poor quality/dirty/poorly <br /> maintained' , and l 1 percent felt there were `Not enough rec. /family activities' . <br /> Reason For Rating Recreational Opportunities as Fair/Poor <br /> Bad c�-owd/ bad place for ldds 3.6 0 <br /> a <br /> Qean/ kept up/ fine '_ 5.4% <br /> Not enough rec. / family activities . 11.0% <br /> Poor / / 1 rr�ntauied I 12.0% <br /> w��r � � Y . . � <br /> � � ,� <br /> Not enough suitable parks d' 16.1% <br /> .. <br /> 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% <br /> Park and Recreation Maintenance <br /> Respondents were also asked to rate the quality of the maintenance of Department's park and <br /> recreation opportunities. Similarly to the ratings of the recreation facilities, an 81%majority of <br /> respondents felt that the maintenance was either `Excellent' or `Good. <br /> Rating of Park and Recreation Maintenance <br /> Fair <br /> Good r 11% <br /> 49% I Poor <br /> I I 3% <br /> No opinion <br /> I <br /> 2°/u <br /> �� DK/NA <br /> 3 °/u <br /> Excellent <br /> 32"/0 <br /> Community Demographics Survey APPENDIX 11 <br /> Results and Existing Measures � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.