AgdaPkt 2017-04-03 Joint SA PFA - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

ATTY/RESO.0031/ CC RESO ADOPTING DENIAL OF APPEAL BY REDWOOD CITY RESIDENTS FOR RESPONSIBLE DEVELOPMENT REV: 03-30-17 PR Page 5 of 22 the EIR that identifies any significant effects which will have a more severe adverse impact than discussed in the certified EIR. Further, as set forth in subdivision (d) of CEQA Guidelines section 15183, the proposed Project is consistent with the DTPP, and an EIR was prepared for the DTPP. f. As set forth in CEQA Guidelines section 15183.3, the Project site is substantially surrounded by urban uses and is currently developed for commercial and office use; it is also surrounded by developed sites on at least 75% of its perimeter. The Project satisfies the applicable performance standards of CEQA Guidelines Appendix M, and the Project is consistent with the general use designation, density, building intensity, and applicable policies specified for the project area in the applicable Sustainable Communities Strategy, in this case Plan Bay Area. See Exhibit A to the IS Checklist for further analysis. g. Pursuant to Guidelines section 15091(e), the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the Planning Commission has based its decision are located in and may be obtained from the Office of the City Clerk at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, California. The City Clerk is the custodian of records for all matters before the City. Section 3. Downtown Planned Community Permit DPC2015-12: In the exercise of its independent judgment, the City Council finds that: a. The Project and improvements proposed by Downtown Planned Community Permit DPC2015-12 are consistent with, conform to the intent of, and will appropriately implement the Downtown Precise Plan for the 1409 El Camino Real project; and b. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the project and improvements proposed by Downtown Planned Community permit DPC2015-12 will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety peace, morals, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the project, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood of the project, or to the general welfare of the City, because the project has been found to be consistent with the community goals established in the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and 8.A. - Page 37