Laserfiche WebLink
Mixed-Use Development and Transit Trip Reduction Evaluation March 20, 2017 <br />P a g e | 2 <br />Table 1 <br />MXD Model Inputs and Trip Reduction Results <br />MXD Model Inputs Value <br />Development Area (acres)183 DPP EIR <br />Number of Intersections in DPP area 77 <br />Employment within One Mile of DPP 33,000 <br />Average Vehicles Owned per Household <br />in DPP area <br />1.12 <br />Average Multi-Family Household Size 2.0 <br />DPP Land Uses <br />- Multi-Family Units (DUs)3,312 <br />- Retail (ksf)1,378 <br />- Office (ksf)2,806 <br />- Lodge (rooms)300 <br />- Light Industrial (ksf)28 <br />MXD Trip Reduction Results <br />Updated Estimate at DPP Buildout DPP EIR Estimate <br />- Daily 22.2%21.0% <br />- AM Peak Hour 16.2%12.3% <br />- PM Peak Hour 21.9%19.1% <br />Assume 737 ksf of general retail, 150 ksf of supermarket, <br />50 ksf of bank, 50 ksf of health club, 100 ksf of non-fast <br />food restaurant, 10 ksf of fast-food restaurant, 10 ksf of <br />gat station, 50 ksf of auto repair based on the existing <br />land use designation (Figure 4.1 of DPP EIR). <br />Include 1,474 ksf of office and 1,332 ksf of <br />civic/institutional. <br />Assume 30 ksf of medical office based on the existing <br />land use designation (Figure 4.1 of DPP EIR). <br />Source/Note <br />Google Map <br />ABAG Land Use Projections for 2040 <br />ACS 2011-2015 5-Year Estimate for Census Tract <br />6102.02, B08201 Household Sze by Vehicle Available. <br />ACS 2011-2015 5-Year Estimate for Census Tract <br />6102.02, B11016 Household Type by Household Size. <br />Table 4.2 of DPP EIR <br /> <br />Transit Trip Reduction <br />Based on the commute mode choice information published by the MTC1, the transit mode share <br />was 10.1 percent in 2014 in San Mateo County and was 17 percent in the Downtown Redwood <br />City tract (6102.02). Although the information does not provide a break down for daily and AM and <br />PM peak hours, the transit mode share percentage is much higher than the trip reduction <br />percentages assumed in the DPP EIR and the 1409 El Camino Real Traffic Study. Thus, the transit <br />trip reductions used in the 1409 El Camino Real Traffic Study are considered to be conservative <br />(low) even based on the existing transit service without considering the effect of planned transit <br />improvements, such as the electrification of Caltrain. <br /> <br />1 Available at http://www.vitalsigns.mtc.ca.gov/commute-mode-choice <br />8.A. - Page 126