Reso PC17-02 0013 PC Reso 801 Brewster

Browse Search

appropriately implement the Downtown Precise Plan for the 801 Brewster Avenue project; and b. The establishment, maintenance and operation of the project and improvements proposed by Downtown Planned Community permit DPC2016- 003 will not, under the circumstances of this particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety peace, morals, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the project, or be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood of the project, or to the general welfare of the City, because the project has been found to be consistent with the community goals established in the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance; and c. With the exception of the two development standard concessions to exceed the maximum building heights pursuant to provisions in State Density Bonus law, the Project and improvements otherwise comply fully with all applicable standards of the DTPP; and d. The Project and improvements comply with all but eleven (11) Guidelines of the DTPP. The aspects of the Project which do not conform to the Guidelines of the DTPP (which are recommended, not mandatory) nonetheless adequately promote the overall intent of the DTPP. e. The Project and improvements will not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of the historic resource at 530 Warren Street, the Mezesville Historic District, or the potential historic resources at 840 Brewster Avenue and 701 Arguello Street; and, that the historic resource, historic district, and potentially historic resources will remain eligible for listing in the California Register of Historic Places. Section 4. Tentative Map TM2016-003: The Planning Commission finds that: a. The map, design, and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the City of Redwood City's General Plan, Municipal Code, Zoning Ordinance, Downtown Precise Plan, and all applicable subdivision improvements requirements; b. The site of the proposed subdivision is physically suited for the type and density of the proposed development; c. The design and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, or substantially and avoidably injure fish, wildlife or their habitat, or cause serious public health problems; and d. The design and proposed improvements of the proposed subdivision will not conflict with essential public easements for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. Section 5. Tentative Map TM2016-003: The Planning Commission finds that the proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the general plan as set forth in the staff report. Section 6. Condominium Permit TM2016-003: The Planning Commission finds that the Project as proposed complies with the requirements of Article XI of the Subdivision Ordinance. ATTY/RES0.0013/PC RESO 801 BREWSTER REV: 02-03-17 PR Page 4 of 18