My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2000-12-04 Spc
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
CC Min 2000-12-04 Spc
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2011 4:07:14 PM
Creation date
5/6/2002 9:57:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Special
Agency Type
City Council & Redevelopment
Date
12/4/2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
and their work is only valuable to the degree that Mundie accomplishes that objectivity in the <br />analysis and reporting the firm produces. Mundie further stated that her firm has been in <br />business for twenty years (next month), and that represents several hundreds of reports. <br />The main questions Mundie was to address were: <br />• Opportunity costs of the project; <br />• Complimentary comments to Kelly's, what if the project is developed and the cinema fails? <br />• How much does the economic success of the cinema depend on parking? <br />In response to the first question, Mundie explained that in this case (developing a project such <br />as the retail- cinema) the opportunity cost is the outcome of any other course of action that this <br />Council might have taken, which the council is foregoing by opting for the retail cinema. In the <br />case of the retail cinema project there are two kinds of opportunity costs: the land (what could <br />one have gotten for the land if it was to be used differently), the other is the proposed project's <br />contribution to downtown revitalization (meaning what other downtown projects could be <br />embraced in lieu of this project which would also promote downtown revitalization). <br />Looking at the issue of land issue, Mundie stated that one must consider that the City only <br />owns part of block one, and secondly its purpose and allowed zoning uses will also determine <br />its cost. This is addressed by looking both at the City Zoning and the characteristics of the area. <br />Based on the previous study, this area will demand parking. Such parking could not be at a <br />subsurface level because the conduit for Redwood Creek goes underground and just about cuts <br />the site in half. Consequently, the maximum office space usable would be 80,000 square feet <br />(because a considerable amount of the area was dedicated to parking). The hypothetical land <br />value of the building described would be in the 4 to 5 million dollars range, which is <br />considerably less than what the proposed project would yield. <br />Block 2 also has the same parking issues, and probably the maximum office space available <br />would be 11,000 square feet. The price would probably be $600,000 to $650,000. Mundie's <br />conclusion then is that these projects would be smaller than the actual proposed project, and the <br />smaller size and the parking requirements, make it doubtful that the City could obtain a higher <br />price for the sites. <br />Mundie further stated that when considering the revitalization process one could reason that <br />since the alternative projects would be smaller scale, the opportunity cost for the revitalization <br />or the downtown would also be smaller. <br />Addressing the second question Mundie stated that one thing to remember is that the cinemas <br />were brought into the project because the commercial district in that area was already failing. <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 4, 2000 <br />PAGE 10 <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 272 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.