CC Min 2000-12-04 Spc - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

The idea was to have the cinemas improve those conditions. From Mundie's observations and studies in other areas such as San Luis Obispo and Santa Barbara, the revitalization effect seems to be so positive that it is feasible to have the commercial districts hold their own, even if - the cinemas were to fail. Consequently, the brief answer is that the City does not lose any more than the benefit that the cinema brought with it in the first place. Mundie said that the final question, which focused on the issue of parking, required a brief answer. While the success of the cinema does depend, to some degree on the parking, the degree of such correlation is not clear. Mundie said that this is particularly true in mixed -use areas. A good guideline is to remember that if the City offers enough parking for retail, in the mixed used districts, that supply will probably be sufficient (in a shared parking setting) to meet the demand from movie goers and avoid economic impacts on the cinema. Everett, informed that staff was also available for comment. Mayor Ruskin initiated the process of public comment. Public Comment - 9:00 P.M. Stan Smith, stated that he really enjoys the downtown, however there is a lack of things to do. Smith fully supports the project, and hopes that after further review the City will decide to go forward with the project. Pat Mahoney, commented that she opposes the project because she does not think Redwood City needs another theater. The traffic should be a very serious concern because it will affect residents. Victor Torreano, resident of Redwood City for 10 years shared his excitement about the project. He stated that this is a good project because it will provide families with a place to go and enjoy themselves. Claire Felong, shared concerns about what will happen to PAL and High Schools. Felong also has concerns related to traffic issues. Felong commented that this project must seriously consider the youth since they are under serviced in this community. Ted Hannig, spoke on behalf of Rob Souflan, Peter Betrosion and PowerHouse Gym. Hannig opposes the project because it is flawed, and the parking created will not be sufficient; instead he suggests housing be built on that site. Hannig requested data on the cost of City's mailing campaign. Mayor Ruskin stated that the cost of brochures sent out was going to be researched. In reference to the statements published, Ruskin clarified that what he meant was that "the retail cinema complex project is a good concept but the devil was on the details." REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES DECEMBER 4, 2000 PAGE I1 MINUTES Book•No.58 Page NO. 273