Laserfiche WebLink
Vice -Mayor Dick Claire reiterated that the assumption that he has made up his mind about <br />approving the project is erroneous; Claire has not decided whether he is for or against the project, <br />and he will wait to complete public comment before making a decision. <br />Edmund Schiffer, requested information on how much money has been spent in the project. <br />Schiffer stated that his major concerns are the thousands of cars, and how this will create a traffic <br />nightmare. <br />Chip Krug, stated that with this project what is the City is giving up is the "Redwood City Charm "; <br />his main concern is the traffic, and how the character of this city will change drastically (pollution, <br />traffic, etc.). The rents will also increase and we will probably lose small stores because they will <br />be unable to compete. Krug would like to see Spanish speaking films due to the diversity in this <br />area. <br />William Naek, representing the Building and Construction Trade's Council of San Mateo County, <br />(membership of approximately 18,000), stated that his organization is in favor of the project, not <br />only because it represents hundreds of jobs (with good and fair wages /benefits) but also because it <br />will revitalize downtown, and provide something to do to the new Franklin Street residents. <br />Richard Wallace, mentioned that he would like to find out what other proposals were received. <br />Wallace stated that information has not been disseminated appropriately, and that a proposed six - <br />story office building that will come with it, is not public knowledge. A request for a scale model <br />has also been made and not provided. <br />Ken Rolandelli, mentioned specific concerns around two structures on Jefferson Ave. 858, 852 and <br />870 (constructed in 1918) showing Spanish eclectic styles. Strongly urges that the shells (walls and <br />roofs) of these buildings be incorporated in the project due to their historical value. <br />Brian Chapman, called to the podium but absent. <br />Elizabeth Travers, property owner in Redwood City for over 40 years, Travers concerns are related <br />to traffic, pollution issues, and another unpleasant buildings like the previously built County Jail. <br />Ms. Travers submitted two newspaper articles that defended the case that revenues from project <br />don't always cover the costs of mega theaters, and strongly encourages housing instead. <br />Vice -Mayor Claire clarified that statements about the County Jail and council members approving <br />such action are incorrect. Claire further stated that the council at that time worked diligently to <br />avoid such construction, however the county is a stronger governmental institution and therefore <br />they went forth with the project. <br />Susan Keely, resident of Redwood City for 42 years stated that this City needs to "reinvent" itself <br />and strongly supports the project if there is a quality vision for the future. Keely would like to see <br />similar structures as those used in City Hall, the Library, Raiser's housing complex. Keely said that <br />young children would meet our expectations if we provide them with clear boundaries. <br />REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 4, 2000 <br />PAGE 12 <br />MINUTES Book No.58 <br />Page NO. 274 <br />