My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-08 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-08 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2017 8:43:31 AM
Creation date
5/4/2017 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/8/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a fourth will do so next year, so these rankings will change over time. <br />used for each scenario represent the typical project cost <br />Public Outreach Efforts <br />Following the City Council Study Session on <br />public outreach effort to notify the community of the proposed user fee changes and <br />provide the opportunity to comment pr <br />The public outreach efforts were targeted to residen <br />community. In addition to all legal public notices, methods of public outreach included: <br />establishing a dedicated webpage an <br />frequently asked questions guide <br />contractors and developers with valid City business licenses <br />social media and the City’s electronic newsletter <br />neighborhood associations; and providing flyers with user fee inf <br />counters at City Hall and the Police Department. <br /> <br />Online Survey Results: <br />The City’s user fee project page received 838 unique visitors during <br />period, 257 of whom completed the online survey poll. The survey consisted <br />high-level policy questions to gauge community support around user fees for <br />commercial customers, homeowners, affordable housing and childcare facilities. <br />Participants were asked to answer questions with a response scale ranging from <br />strongly disagree to strongly agree. <br /> <br />The following pie charts illustrate the survey results: <br /> <br />Q1: Commercial property owners/business owners/multi <br />units or more) should fully reimburse the City for services associated with construction <br />on their property. <br /> <br />Agree or Strongly Agree: 67% <br />Neither Agree nor Disagree: 12% <br />Disagree or Strongly Disagree: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />a fourth will do so next year, so these rankings will change over time. <br />enario represent the typical project cost. <br />Study Session on February 27, staff embarked on a robust <br />public outreach effort to notify the community of the proposed user fee changes and <br />provide the opportunity to comment prior to the City Council’s adoption of any changes <br />The public outreach efforts were targeted to residents and the C <br />community. In addition to all legal public notices, methods of public outreach included: <br />establishing a dedicated webpage and email address for the project; <br />frequently asked questions guide; conducting an online survey poll; <br />contractors and developers with valid City business licenses; crafting messages via <br />social media and the City’s electronic newsletter; presenting to business groups and <br />and providing flyers with user fee information at public <br />counters at City Hall and the Police Department. <br />The City’s user fee project page received 838 unique visitors during the <br />period, 257 of whom completed the online survey poll. The survey consisted <br />level policy questions to gauge community support around user fees for <br />commercial customers, homeowners, affordable housing and childcare facilities. <br />Participants were asked to answer questions with a response scale ranging from <br />ree to strongly agree. <br />illustrate the survey results: <br />1: Commercial property owners/business owners/multi-family property owners (four <br />units or more) should fully reimburse the City for services associated with construction <br />Agree or Strongly Agree: 67% <br />12% <br />Disagree or Strongly Disagree: 21% <br /> The valuations <br />27, staff embarked on a robust <br />public outreach effort to notify the community of the proposed user fee changes and <br />’s adoption of any changes. <br />City’s business <br />community. In addition to all legal public notices, methods of public outreach included: <br />d email address for the project; drafting a <br />; contacting all <br />crafting messages via <br />presenting to business groups and <br />ormation at public <br /> public outreach <br />period, 257 of whom completed the online survey poll. The survey consisted of four <br />level policy questions to gauge community support around user fees for <br />commercial customers, homeowners, affordable housing and childcare facilities. <br />Participants were asked to answer questions with a response scale ranging from <br />family property owners (four <br />units or more) should fully reimburse the City for services associated with construction <br />8.B. - Page 6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.