My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-08 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-08 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2017 8:43:31 AM
Creation date
5/4/2017 3:47:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/8/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
493
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
· Mills Act Historic Permits <br />· Sidewalk Seating Extension within Parking Right-of-Way <br />· Temporary Certificate of Occupancy <br />· Utility Encroachment Permit <br />· Wireless Communication Facilities <br /> <br />Comparative Scenarios of Development Project Costs <br />During the Study Session on February 27, The City Council requested that staff analyze <br />the total costs (including Impact and In-Lieu Fees) per square foot for the most typical <br />development project scenarios. The four scenarios analyzed were: <br /> <br />1) Single family home <br />2) 100-unit multi-family housing <br />3) Large commercial office <br />4) Commercial/restaurant tenant improvement <br /> <br />For each scenario, staff compared total project costs in Redwood City to other regional <br />cities including: Cupertino, Menlo Park, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Carlos, San <br />Mateo, Santa Clara, and Sunnyvale. Detailed information and a survey of comparative <br />jurisdictions is included in Attachment 3. <br /> <br />It is important to note that the comparative cities do not have the same Impact and In- <br />lieu Fees as Redwood City. Moreover, fees were implemented at different timeframes in <br />each city. For example, the cities of Cupertino, Menlo Park and Palo Alto conducted fee <br />studies within the last two years. However, Mountain View, San Carlos, San Mateo, and <br />Sunnyvale conducted fee studies over four years ago. Menlo Park, San Carlos, and San <br />Mateo are currently undertaking comprehensive fee studies, while Mountain View is <br />planning to conduct a study in the upcoming year. <br /> <br />In reviewing each scenario, the proposed fee changes result in a decrease in total costs <br />as compared to current costs in Redwood City for the single family home, multi-family <br />housing, and large commercial office scenarios, and an increase in the <br />commercial/restaurant tenant improvement scenario. The scenarios illustrate that, when <br />comparing current fees (processing fees, impact fees and in-lieu fees) in seven other <br />communities to the proposed fees in Redwood City, the proposed fees would result in <br />Redwood City having the fourth highest combined fees for new single family homes, the <br />third highest combined fees for multifamily housing, the third highest combined fees for <br />commercial office building shell, and the second highest combined fees for commercial <br />tenant improvements. As noted, three communities are conducting fee studies now, and <br />8.B. - Page 5
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.