My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-05-22 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/30/2017 8:17:26 AM
Creation date
5/18/2017 3:43:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
5/22/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
386
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 14 of 27 <br /> <br />not dictate style, but will add final design touches to buildings in order to give them a <br />character that may be unique but complimentary with the architecture of Downtown <br />Redwood City.” (DTPP, p. 26) <br /> <br />For the Contemporary architectural style, the regulations that add those “final design <br />touches” allow for a variety of roof forms, including flat or shaped roofs, and a variety of <br />wall cladding materials that includes brick, stucco, wood, ceramic tile, terra cotta or <br />metal (i.e. the same types of materials used in the Project). The DTPP states that the <br />Contemporary Architectural Character Type guidelines “draw upon contemporary <br />building materials, modern construction methods, and simple geometric forms to create <br />a visual identity that is strongly distinct from the historically-inspired Character Types.” <br />(DTPP, p. 119) The Project’s architectural character accomplishes just that, and <br />therefore it complies with all of the Contemporary Architectural Character Type <br />regulations. <br /> <br />iii. The Project Complies with the Building Height and Setback Requirements <br />of the DTPP, and is Appropriately Scaled <br /> <br />Appellant’s Contention: The Project does not establish a distinctive “human scaled” <br />district that retains the “history, charm and livability” of an historic medium sized city; <br />that it is not well scaled to surrounding neighborhoods; that the building height is <br />lopsided and uncomfortable when compared to adjacent buildings; that the proposed <br />building is not adequately set back from the street; that the proposed building base cap <br />does not promote a “human scale” to aid in reducing the imposing nature of taller <br />buildings; and that the building violates the maximum corner height requirements. (See <br />Appeal, pp. 2-5) <br /> <br />City’s Response: The DTPP encourages the tallest buildings to be placed in the <br />Downtown Core, where the maximum building height is 12-stories. This 12-story height <br />zone includes the Project site (not 10-stories as stated on page 5 of the Appeal) and the <br />entire block on which it is located. The Project is proposed to be 6-stories in height, and <br />the 8-story office building project at 601 Marshall Street that is presently under <br />construction is located on the same block as the Project. <br /> <br />Within specific areas of downtown the DTPP imposes targeted 3, 4, and 5-story step- <br />down height zones in order to “bring heights down from the standard 8-story maximum <br />permitted height in areas with high concentrations of historic resources, potential <br />shadow concerns, or areas adjacent to low-rise neighborhoods.” (DTPP, p. 84) As <br />shown in yellow, beige, and orange in Figure 1 on the following page, these step-down <br />height zones are located immediately to the east and west of the historic courthouse, <br />along Hamilton Street and Middlefield Road, along the frontages of Broadway and Main <br />Street, and along the perimeter of the DTPP area. <br /> <br />By incorporating the mandatory step-down height zones, the DTPP has already <br />mitigated impacts to identified key historic resources by limiting the heights of certain <br />parcels in order to avoid impacts. The DTPP does not require any height step-downs <br />8.A. - Page 14
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.