My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-06-12 Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-06-12 Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2017 11:00:53 AM
Creation date
6/8/2017 2:54:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/12/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
506
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ELF Financing Strategy <br /> San Mateo County ELF Study‐2016 <br />February 21, 2017 <br /> <br />Prepared by Brion Economics Team Final Report 25 <br />require additional community benefits on any new commercial development over the allowable 45% <br />Floor Area Ratio.25 <br />The notion of CBPs is that the city in question receives some sort of additional benefit above and <br />beyond the normal impact fees, conditions of approval, and other building fees new development <br />must pay. These types of programs are still relatively new but becoming more popular. The types of <br />improvements or services provided include: <br /> Additional affordable housing, beyond baseline requirements <br /> Parks and open space <br /> New community facilities such as senior centers, recreation amenities, etc. <br /> Green Building Standards, such as LEED gold or platinum <br /> Contributions to job training programs, homeless services, youth mentoring, etc. <br /> Bike parking, bike and pedestrian trails, etc. <br /> Transportation improvements and Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs <br /> Shuttles and special connection services from train and BART stations, etc. <br />In general, CBPs allow for a range of community benefits and flexibility for developers. In some cases, <br />a “competition” is set for a limited amount of development approval, and the projects with the best <br />community benefits package may be selected. Community benefits can be “negotiation‐based” <br />through a development agreement or other similar document or “plan‐based,” and set by resolution <br />and ordinance.26 While we are not aware of child care being identified in a community benefits <br />program, child care represents a broad community benefit that could be eligible for this sort of <br />program. <br />Redwood City Community Benefits Program <br />Partnership Redwood City is a unique program that provides community benefits through a wide range <br />of City partnerships. Through ongoing collaboration with businesses, community groups, residents, <br />property owners, and developers, this program will deliver benefits such as affordable housing, <br />improved schools, parks, transportation systems, programs for the arts, and support for special <br />programs and events. These partnerships ensure that all community members will benefit from new <br />development and investment in Redwood City. Partnership Redwood City was created using <br />community forums during 2014 and 2015 to determine the needs of the community. In February of <br />2015 the City Council adopted the program, which remains adjustable in order to respond to further <br />input from the community. Development projects have paid impact fees and donated more than $27. <br />million to programs found in the Partnership Redwood City Program. <br />The requirements of the Redwood City community benefits program include: <br /> <br />25 See https://www.menlopark.org/DocumentCenter/View/12613 part of ConnectMenlo, General Plan Update. October <br />2016. <br />26 See “Development Management Overview,” prepared for City of Cupertino by Economic & Planning Systems, Inc. and <br />Burke, Williams & Sorensen, LLP (June 24, 2015); includes overview of CBPs and several case studies. <br />8.C. - Page 44
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.