My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-06-26 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:53:14 PM
Creation date
6/22/2017 4:17:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/26/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
646
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
loading of data and is available to assist in defining conversion requirements and methods. We are <br />available provide hands-on technical support related to data extraction, transformation, and data <br />quality evaluation. <br />♦ NexLevel will participate in conversion validation planning, including advising on validation <br />methods (real time input to whomever is executing the validations) and reviewing validation results <br />(assuming those results would be generated by the Cities. <br />♦ NexLevel will participate in developing the go-live cutover plan and be present for the go-live to <br />oversee activities to ensure the move to production is successful. <br />♦ NexLevel will conduct a post-implementation evaluation review (PIER) after system implementation <br />to enable the Cities to evaluate the contribution and measure the value gained by implementing the new system. The PIER will provide for organizational learning by documenting the success of <br />the project and the reasons for that success. <br />7. Estimated Project Timeline <br />Based on our experience with similar projects, and utilizing the Cities specific RFP requirements, we <br />developed the estimated project timeline shown in Figure 4. <br /> <br />Weeks 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 <br />1 - Discovery <br />2 - Budget <br />10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 <br />3 - RFP <br />19 20 21 22 23 24 <br /> <br /> <br />Figure 4 - Project Timeline <br />As shown, this timeline is for the first three phases, as those will be completed over a period of 24 <br />weeks. The ability to achieve this estimated timeline will be dependent upon numerous factors <br />including, but not limited to, the following: <br />• Availability of staff throughout the project <br />• Time required for Cities deliverable review <br />• Whether the Cities go with one RFP, or each goes with a separate RFP <br />• Whether the Cities go with one solution, or each goes with a different solution <br />NexLevel can accelerate the proposed timeline if the Cities wish to complete specific aspects of the <br />project in a shorter timeframe. For example, Phase 3 – RFP can be initiated prior to the completion of <br />the Phase 1 – Discovery. <br />Phase 4 – System Implementation is not shown as it will depend on the vendor selected, available city <br />staff resources, and the final scope of work that is negotiated for each city. Typically, an ERP <br />implementation will run 18 – 24 months. <br /> <br /> <br />Attachment 1 to Exhibit A <br />REV: 06-15-17 JS <br />ATTY/AGR/2017.127/NEXLEVEL-FSR CONSULTANT <br />Page 26 of 28 <br />6.1.E. - Page 41
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.