CC Min 1989-05-15 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

8. RESOLUTION NO. 11037 APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., IN ORDER TO ENABLE THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO ACCEPT PAYMENT BY CREDIT CARD FOR SALES OF SAN FRANCISCO 49ERS TURFGRASS AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION AND DELIVERY OF SALES SLIPS, CREDIT MEMORANDA, AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATING TO THE PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. BY CITY (702 -02) 9. RESOLUTION NO. 11038 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSTALLATION OF A NEW HEATING AND COOLING SYSTEM (HVAC) AT THE VETERANS MEMORIAL THEATRE; AND AUTHORIZING CITY CLERK TO CALL FOR BIDS THEREFOR (702 -03) 10. Approve warrant nos. 18646 through 18906 APPROVED ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Item No. 6 from the Consent Calendar. Appeal of decision of Planning Commission to deny application for minor subdivision at 631 Canyon road. (203 -10) M /S: Murray /Bury to accept findings of 631 Canyon Road as follows: FINDINGS ON APPEAL FROM DECISION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO DENY AN APPLICATION FOR A MINOR SUBDIVISION OF PROPERTY LOCATED AT 631 CANYON ROAD, REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA Hearing having been duly noticed and held by this Council on May 1, 1989, on the appeal of James McFaden and Frank Dal Porto ( "Appellants ") of the decision of the Planning commission of the City of Redwood City ( "Commission ") to deny Appellants' application for a minor subdivision pursuant to Redwood City Code ( "RCC ") Section 30.11 for property located at 631 Canyon road, Redwood City ( the "Subject Property ") , Appellants' , the Planning Director, and all other persons interested in the matter having been heard and having been given the opportunity to be heard, and this Council having fully considered the matter; NOW, THEREFORE, this Council hereby finds, determines and concludes as follows: FINDINGS 1. On or about November 15, 1988, the Subdivision Committee of the City of Redwood City denied Appellants' application for a minor subdivision of the Subject Property on the grounds that the proposed subdivision would be inconsistent with the Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance No. 1130, as amended ( "Zoning Ord. ") in that the proposal would create a "rear parcel" with an area of less than the 10,000 square foot minimum established for parcels with 15% slopes (Zon. Ord. S5.6, as modified by S32.2, establishing minimum building site areas for sloping sites); and also on the ground that said subdivision would create a "panhandle lot" (i.e., a lot for which street frontage or access width is less than the minimum required) pursuant to RCC 53.117 (f), the street frontage and access width of which would be 20 feet, rather than the 35 -foot minimum required (id.). Reg.Mtg. 5/15/89 Page 6 MINUTE BOOK NO. 48 Page No. 387