Laserfiche WebLink
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 105 <br />treatment. These districts include the Emerald Lake Heights, Fair Oaks, Kensington Square, Oak <br />Knoll and Edgewood Sewer Districts. The project site is located within San Mateo County’s Fair <br />Oaks Sewer Maintenance District and the wastewater contributions of all of these districts are <br />considered part of the City’s total inflows to the SVCW treatment plant. <br /> <br />The SVCW treatment plant has an operating capacity of 29 million gallons per day (mgd) average dry <br />weather flow. The plant is permitted by the Water Board to discharge 29 mgd ADWF into San <br />Francisco Bay. The current permitted peak wet weather capacity of the SVCW facility is 71 mgd. <br />Redwood City’s peak wet weather allocation at the treatment plant is approximately 30.5 mgd.117 <br />SVCW adopted a 10-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in 2008 which will assure that the <br />facility is able to continue to meet or exceed the wastewater treatment requirements established for it <br />by the Water Board.118 In addition, the City completed a Sewer Master Plan in 2008, which evaluated <br />the capacity of the sewer system under existing and future 2030 loading conditions,119 based on land <br />use assumptions as well as 2030 projections from the Association of Bay Area Governments <br />(ABAG). The Sewer Master Plan recommended a program of projects to expand the capacity of the <br />City’s wastewater collection system, primarily consisting of new or expanded sewer lines in <br />prioritized locations. These projects were incorporated into a capital improvement program and are <br />expected to be implemented over a 10 to 15 year time frame.120 <br /> <br />The proposed project would increase wastewater generation on the site compared to existing <br />conditions. For the purposes of this analysis, wastewater generation is assumed to be approximately <br />90 percent of water usage (the 10 percent differential includes consumed water and water used for <br />irrigation). As discussed below in Section XVII.d, water demand associated with proposed project is <br />assumed to be 913 gallons per day; therefore, wastewater generation is anticipated to be 822 gallons <br />per day. Although the project would increase wastewater generation compared to existing conditions, <br />the increase in demand for wastewater treatment services would result in a less than 0.001 percent <br />contribution to the daily permitted treatment capacity of the wastewater treatment plant. In addition, <br />the 2008 Sewer Master Plan and capital improvement program ensure that there is sufficient capacity <br />available at the SVCW treatment plant to treat additional wastewater flows. Therefore, wastewater <br />generated from the proposed project would not cause the SVCW to violate any wastewater treatment <br />requirements and this impact would be less than significant. <br /> <br />b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or <br />expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental <br />effects? (Less-Than-Significant Impact) <br /> <br />Wastewater Infrastructure. As discussed in Section XVII.a, wastewater treatment for <br />Redwood City is provided by the SVCW treatment plant and the wastewater collection system is <br />maintained by the City. The project site would be served by existing wastewater lines and would not <br />require the construction of new wastewater treatment facilities or the expansion of existing ones. An <br /> <br />117 Ibid. <br />118 Ibid. <br />119 Ibid. <br />120 Ibid. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 113 of 124