My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 4:18:31 PM
Creation date
6/28/2017 4:06:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 111 <br />b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? <br />(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable <br />when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, <br />and the effects of probable future projects.) (Less-Than-Significant Impact) <br /> <br />The proposed project’s impacts would be individually limited and not cumulatively considerable. <br />The potentially significant impacts that can be reduced to a less-than-significant level with <br />implementation of recommended mitigation measures include the topics of air quality, cultural <br />resources, geology and soils, and greenhouse gas emissions. These impacts would primarily be <br />related to construction-period activities, would be temporary in nature, and would not substantially <br />contribute to any potential cumulative impacts associated with these topics. For the topic of air <br />quality, potentially significant impacts to air quality standards associated with project construction <br />would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1. <br />For the topic of cultural resources, potentially significant impacts to archaeological resources and <br />paleontological resources would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of <br />Mitigation Measures CUL-1a, CUL-1b, and CUL-2. For the topic of geology and soils, impacts <br />associated with liquefaction and expansive soils would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with <br />implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1a and GEO-1b. For the topic of greenhouse gas <br />emissions, the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment associated with project <br />construction would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of Mitigation <br />Measure AIR-1. <br /> <br />For the topics of aesthetics, agricultural and forestry resources, biological resources, hazards and <br />hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and planning, mineral resources, noise, <br />population and housing, public services, recreation, traffic, and utilities and service systems, the <br />project would have no impacts or less-than-significant impacts, and therefore, the project would not <br />substantially contribute to any potential cumulative impacts for these topics. All environmental <br />impacts that could occur as a result of the proposed project would be reduced to a less-than- <br />significant level through the implementation of the mitigation measures recommended in this <br />document (see Mitigation Measures AIR-1, CUL-1, CUL-2, GEO-1, and HAZ-1). <br /> <br />Implementation of these measures would ensure that the impacts of the project would be below <br />established thresholds of significance and that these impacts would not combine with the impacts of <br />other cumulative projects to result in a cumulatively considerable impact on the environment as a <br />result of project development. Therefore, this impact would be less than significant. <br /> <br />c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on <br />human beings, either directly or indirectly? (No Impact) <br /> <br />The proposed project would not result in any environmental effects that would cause substantial <br />direct or indirect adverse effects to human beings. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 119 of 124
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.