Laserfiche WebLink
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 68 <br />As previously discussed, Redwood City is the Lead Agency for environmental review. As shown in <br />Figure 5, the project site is currently designated Industrial – Light on the Redwood City General Plan <br />Land Use Policy Map. The Industrial ‐ Light category provides areas for relatively low‐intensity <br />industrial uses. Light industrial activities do not involve substantial truck traffic or outdoor fabrication <br />or assembly, do not produce odors, generally operate only during typical weekday hours, and do not <br />involve any operations normally considered hazardous within an urban environment. Prohibited uses <br />within this designation include commercial warehousing, trucking and transportation‐related <br />businesses, and heavy manufacturing. <br /> <br />As shown in Figure 6, the southern portion of the project site (the existing building) is zoned IR <br />(Industrial Restricted) on the Redwood City Zoning Map and the northern portion of the site (the <br />existing surface parking lot) is designated M-1 (Light Industrial) on the San Mateo County Zoning <br />Map. <br /> <br />In Redwood City, the intent of the IR District is to promote viable industrial areas by providing a <br />district for the location of selected industries, wholesale establishments, specified retail establish- <br />ments, and heavy commercial uses which can congregate together without offense to each other or to <br />neighboring districts, yet which, because of the nature of their operations, cannot maintain standards <br />as high as those required in the IP (Industrial Park) District. The zoning district is intended to <br />preserve land for a wide range of industrial uses by limiting office uses. Public and quasi-public uses, <br />such as schools, are permitted within this District;95 therefore, the proposed project would be <br />consistent with the requirements of the IR Zoning District. <br /> <br />In San Mateo County, the general purpose of the M-1 District is to provide industrial areas primarily <br />for the location of manufacturing land uses that do not create more than a moderate impact on the <br />surrounding area and are adequately scaled and set back from adjacent residential land uses; accom- <br />modate a compatible mix of trades and services, transportation, communication, utility, and <br />institutional land uses; and protect the functional and economic viability of industrial areas by <br />restricting incompatible land uses. School uses are not permitted by right in the M-1 District; <br />therefore, a Conditional Use Permit from the County is required to allow the school use. <br /> <br />It should be noted that according to CEQA, policy conflicts do not, in and of themselves, constitute a <br />significant environmental impact. Policy conflicts are considered to be environmental impacts only <br />when they would result in direct physical impacts or where those conflicts relate to avoiding or <br />mitigating environmental impacts. As such, associated physical environmental impacts are discussed <br />in this Initial Study under specific topical sections. However, the proposed project would be <br />consistent with the following applicable General Plan policies as discussed below. <br /> Policy BE‐1.5: Require that new and renovated buildings be designed to avoid styles, colors, and <br />materials that negatively impact the environment or the design character of the neighborhood, <br />corridor, and center in which they are located. <br /> Policy BE‐1.8: Require that new projects are integrated as seamlessly as possible into surrounding <br />development, creating extensions of the urban fabric. <br /> <br />95 Redwood City, City of, 2014. Redwood City, California Zoning Code, Section 17.2. May 23. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 76 of 124