My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
Planning Commission
>
2017
>
Reso PC17-07 0032 PC Reso Approving CEQA - 860 Charter St
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/28/2017 4:18:31 PM
Creation date
6/28/2017 4:06:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
Planning Commission
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
137
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. <br />SEPTEMBER 2016 <br />ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br />INITIAL STUDY/ MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> <br /> <br />P:\RWC1401B Rocketship School\PRODUCTS\IS-MND\Public\Rocketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx (09/29/16) PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 70 <br />any valuable resources exist.96 Therefore, the project would not result in the loss of availability of a <br />known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or residents of the State. <br /> <br />b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br />on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? (No Impact) <br /> <br />Please refer to Section XI.a. The proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of any <br />known locally important mineral resource recovery site. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Potentially <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />Potentially <br />Significant <br />Unless <br />Mitigation <br />Incorporated <br />Less Than <br />Significant <br />Impact <br />No <br />Impact <br />XII. NOISE. Would the project result in: <br /> <br /> <br />a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels <br />in excess of standards established in the local <br />general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable <br />standards of other agencies? <br /> <br /> <br />b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive <br />ground borne vibration or ground borne noise <br />levels? <br /> <br /> <br />c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise <br />levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br />without the project? <br /> <br /> <br />d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in <br />ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above <br />levels existing without the project? <br /> <br /> <br />e) For a project located within an airport land use plan <br />or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 <br />miles of a public airport or public use airport, would <br />the project expose people residing or working in the <br />project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> <br /> <br />f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, <br />would the project expose people residing or working <br />in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />96 Redwood City, City of, 2010. Redwood City General Plan. <br /> <br />ATTY/RESO.0032/PC RESO APPROVING CEQA - 860 CHARTER ST. EXHIBIT A <br />REV: 06-15-17 PR <br />Page 78 of 124
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.