Laserfiche WebLink
i) Introduction of Ordinance; (301) <br /> <br />.... ORDINANCE ADDING TABLE 1 TO ARTICLE II, CHAPTER 3, OF THE <br /> CODE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY, AND AMENDING SECTION <br /> 3.114 OF SAID CODE, RELATING TO COMBINED AREA OF WALL SIGNS <br /> AND UNAUTHORIZED LOCATIONS OF SIGNS, RESPECTIVELY; <br /> MINUTE ORDER 99-166 <br /> <br /> The motion passed by a unanimous roll call vote with Council Member Ira absent. <br /> <br /> C. Information report on the Sign Inventory: <br /> <br /> Principal Planner Jany, informed Council that his presentation was composed of three parts: <br /> first some background information on the sign ordinance, secondly a report on sign inventory <br /> and lastly discussion on the next steps and direction from Council. With the adoption in June <br /> 1999 of a new sign ordinance by the City Council, the purpose was to streamline the sign <br /> ordinance. Such ordinance was needed because the old ordinance did not take into account <br /> proportion of buildings (where allowable sign area should reflect faqade area). The previous <br /> ordinance also allowed for no exceptions. The current ordinance offers three types of <br /> exceptions: minor (which can be granted by staff), master sign programs, and variances, which <br /> can be granted following certain legal findings. This type of flexibility is both business <br /> friendly, and it also helps solve problems in the long run. The new ordinance also has <br /> amortization periods, (which is the amount of time a non-conforming sign can remain before it <br /> has to be removed) these vary from 30 days to 7 years. <br /> <br /> Principal Planner Jany, requested Council to provide him with guidance on the following <br /> issues: 1) How should the City approach enforcement? (Phased approach or comprehensive <br /> approach); 2) What should the time lines be and assess staffing needs? 3) Does council which <br /> to set a date for a public hearing? 4) How are we going to staff up for the increased need in <br /> enforcement and follow-up? <br /> <br /> Planning Technician Kowalski, reported that since June staff has been busy trying to develop <br /> an inventory of over 1300 sites, and each site has several signs. The City is required by State <br /> Law to take inventory of all signs in place, and once this is done, and only then can the City <br /> begin enforcement on the business that have violations. The intent is to keep this database <br /> updated so that our staff will know exactly what signs are out there. Each item in the database <br /> will include: name of business, physical address, digital picture, sign dimensions, faCade <br /> measurements, maximum allotment for each business, and if they are in violation or not of the <br /> ordinance. The results of the study show that of 1300 business perused, at least 531 had one <br /> violation or more. Citywide, there was a total of 906 violations, consequently a few of those <br /> businesses have more than one violation. The most common violation is excessive signage in <br /> <br /> REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 13, 1999 <br /> MINUTES PAGE 7 <br /> MINUTES Book No.57 <br /> Page NO. 491 <br /> <br /> <br />