My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.D. - Page 38 <br /> APPENDIX C <br /> This table shows the verbatim responses to this question from the Grand Jury's survey of police <br /> departments and the Sheriff's Office: "Before purchasing the technology, did you inform <br /> residents of your intention to acquire surveillance tools?" <br /> City How Cities Responded <br /> Atherton The projects and expenses were approved by the Town <br /> Council and divulged as part of the public agenda in staff <br /> reports. <br /> Belmont Belmont did respond "Yes"to the question but did not <br /> provide details. <br /> Broadmoor N/A (no surveillance technology in use). <br /> Brisbane Law enforcement did not reach out to the community <br /> Burlingame Body Worn Cameras we responded to the Grand Jury's <br /> recommendation to implement and went before our City <br /> Council for approval. <br /> GPS we did not notify our community <br /> Police Department Cameras we did not notify our <br /> community <br /> Colma N/A (no surveillance technology in use). <br /> Note: The Police Department will reach out to residents at <br /> council meetings and social media if the Department does <br /> plan to acquire surveillance technology. <br /> Daly City Staff report to City Council for approval <br /> East Palo Alto ShotSpotter: This was installed during Chief Ronald Davis <br /> tenure and I believe there was involvement with community <br /> and the matter was approved by the City Council. <br /> Additionally, each year that I renew the contract, it goes <br /> before the City Council and the community has the <br /> opportunity to comment on the use of the system. <br /> Foster City Law enforcement did not reach out to the community <br /> Hillsborough The ALPR mobile unit purchase was introduced over the <br /> course of several council meetings and approved by City <br /> Council. We also hosted a number of community forums on <br /> the topic of crime prevention and discussed the ALPR <br /> technology prior to and after it was approved. Additionally, <br /> we regularly update our council with details and statistics <br /> from our ALPR program. <br /> 2016-2017 San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury 31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.