Laserfiche WebLink
7.A. - Page 58 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> evaluate the effectiveness of the active system. DTSC will not approve the proposed use of the on-site <br /> building as a school unless indoor air screening levels are met. With implementation of the Work Plan <br /> and soil vapor recovery system,indoor air quality associated with the project would not expose <br /> sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Furthermore,the soil vapor is an existing <br /> condition that is not caused or exacerbated by the project. <br /> Outdoor Air Quality. Emissions of VOCs to outdoor air from the subsurface contamination <br /> were evaluated as part of the site characterization and were"considered minor due to atmospheric <br /> mixing. ,21 Any emissions from the building vapor collection system would similarly disperse in the <br /> air and would be below levels of concern. <br /> e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number ofpeople? (Less-Than-Significant <br /> Impact) <br /> The proposed project would not involve permanent land uses or activities that would generate <br /> objectionable odors. Construction-related activities, such as exhaust from construction vehicles and <br /> equipment and building materials,may result in objectionable odors;however,these odors would be <br /> temporary and short in duration. Once operational,the proposed project would not create objectionable <br /> odors affecting a substantial number of people. <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.Would the project: <br /> a) Have a substantial adverse effect,either directly or ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> through habitat modifications,on any species <br /> identified as a candidate,sensitive,or special status <br /> species in local or regional plans,policies,or <br /> regulations,or by the California Department of Fish <br /> and Game or U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> habitat or other sensitive natural community identified <br /> in local or regional plans,policies,regulations or by <br /> the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. <br /> Fish and Wildlife Service? <br /> 21 The Source Group Inc.,2016,op.cit. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Sch-I\PRODUCrSUS-MND1Public\Ra ketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx(09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 34 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 42 of 124 <br />