My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 74 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. <br /> Would the project: <br /> d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to <br /> Government Code Section 65962.5 and,as a result, <br /> would it create a significant hazard to the public or <br /> the environment? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 <br /> miles of a public airport or public use airport,would <br /> the project result in a safety hazard for people <br /> residing or working in the project area? <br /> I) For a project located within the vicinity of a private ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> airstrip,would the project result in a safety hazard for <br /> people residing or working in the project area? <br /> g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> an adopted emergency response plan or emergency <br /> evacuation plan? <br /> h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> loss,injury or death involving wildland fires, <br /> including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized <br /> areas or where residences are intermixed with <br /> wildlands? <br /> This analysis considers potential environmental impacts that could occur with implementation of the <br /> proposed project,including those related to construction and operation of a sub-slab depressurization <br /> system(SSDS)designed to address the potential presence of VOCs inside the project site structure;no <br /> hazards impacts related to construction or operation of the SSDS were identified. <br /> a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, <br /> or disposal of hazardous materials?(Less-Than-Significant Impact) <br /> The proposed charter school would likely store a minor amount of hazardous materials associated <br /> with cleaning compounds and other maintenance elements on the project site,as well as possible <br /> science course-related chemicals. Handling, storage,and use of these hazardous materials and <br /> disposal of any hazardous wastes would be required to comply with applicable laws and regulations. <br /> Because of the small quantities involved and the regulatory requirements,the risk of upset and <br /> accidental conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment would be less <br /> than significant. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Schwl\PRODUCrSUS-MNDT&Iic\Ra kets*Public Review 09-29-16.do (09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 50 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 58 of 124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.