My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 94 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> any valuable resources exist.96 Therefore,the project would not result in the loss of availability of a <br /> known mineral resource that would be of value to the region or residents of the State. <br /> b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated <br /> on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan?(No Impact) <br /> Please refer to Section XLa. The proposed project would not result in the loss of availability of any <br /> known locally important mineral resource recovery site. <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> XII. NOISE.Would the project result in: <br /> a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> in excess of standards established in the local <br /> general plan or noise ordinance,or applicable <br /> standards of other agencies? <br /> b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> ground borne vibration or ground bome noise <br /> levels? <br /> c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> levels in the project vicinity above levels existing <br /> without the project? <br /> d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above <br /> levels existing without the project? <br /> e) For a project located within an airport land use plan ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> or,where such a plan has not been adopted,within 2 <br /> miles of a public airport or public use airport,would <br /> the project expose people residing or working in the <br /> project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> would the project expose people residing or working <br /> in the project area to excessive noise levels? <br /> 96 Redwood City,City of,2010.Redwood City General Plan. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Sch-I\PRODUCrSUS-MNDT&Iic\R-ketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx(09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 70 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 78 of 124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.