My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 104 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> Potentially <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Unless Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC.Would the project: <br /> a) Conflict with an applicable plan,ordinance or policy ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> establishing measures of effectiveness for the <br /> performance of the circulation system,taking into <br /> account all modes of transportation including mass <br /> transit and non-motorized travel and relevant <br /> components of the circulation system,including but not <br /> limited to intersections,streets,highways and freeways, <br /> pedestrian and bicycle paths,and mass transit? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> program,including,but not limited to level of service <br /> standards and travel demand measures,or other <br /> standards established by the county congestion <br /> management agency for designated roads or highways? <br /> c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns,including ❑ ❑ ❑ <br /> either an increase in traffic levels or a change in <br /> location that results in substantial safety risks? <br /> d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> (e.g.,sharp curves or dangerous intersections)or <br /> incompatible uses(e.g.,farm equipment)? <br /> e) Result in inadequate emergency access? ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> f) Conflict with adopted polices,plans,or programs ❑ ❑ ® ❑ <br /> regarding public transit,bicycle,or pedestrian <br /> facilities,or otherwise decrease the performance or <br /> safety of such facilities? <br /> The following section is based on information provided in the Traffic Study108 prepared for the <br /> proposed project and included as Appendix F of this report. The study evaluates the transportation <br /> impacts that could result from the proposed project,including impacts associated with traffic <br /> congestion,transit services,and pedestrian and bicycle circulation. A review of site access,on-site <br /> circulation,and drop-off and pick-up operations is also provided. Parking is also discussed, for <br /> informational purposes only. <br /> 108 Hexagon Transportation Consultants,Inc.,2016,op.cit. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Sch-I\PRODUCrSUS-MND1Public\Ra ketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx(09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 80 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 88 of 124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.