My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2017
>
AgdaPkt 2017-09-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/21/2017 12:51:50 PM
Creation date
9/7/2017 6:06:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
9/11/2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
530
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TA. - Page 135 <br /> LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. ROCKETSHIP REDWOOD CITY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PROJECT <br /> SEPTEMBER 2016 INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION <br /> b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? <br /> ("Cumulatively considerable"means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable <br /> when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, <br /> and the effects of probable future projects) (Less-Than-Significant Impact) <br /> The proposed project's impacts would be individually limited and not cumulatively considerable. <br /> The potentially significant impacts that can be reduced to a less-than-significant level with <br /> implementation of recommended mitigation measures include the topics of air quality,cultural <br /> resources,geology and soils,and greenhouse gas emissions. These impacts would primarily be <br /> related to construction-period activities,would be temporary in nature,and would not substantially <br /> contribute to any potential cumulative impacts associated with these topics.For the topic of air <br /> quality,potentially significant impacts to air quality standards associated with project construction <br /> would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of Mitigation Measure AIR-1. <br /> For the topic of cultural resources,potentially significant impacts to archaeological resources and <br /> paleontological resources would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of <br /> Mitigation Measures CUL-la,CUL-lb,and CUL-2.For the topic of geology and soils,impacts <br /> associated with liquefaction and expansive soils would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with <br /> implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-la and GEO-lb. For the topic of greenhouse gas <br /> emissions,the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on the environment associated with project <br /> construction would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with implementation of Mitigation <br /> Measure AIR-1. <br /> For the topics of aesthetics,agricultural and forestry resources,biological resources,hazards and <br /> hazardous materials,hydrology and water quality,land use and planning,mineral resources,noise, <br /> population and housing,public services,recreation,traffic,and utilities and service systems,the <br /> project would have no impacts or less-than-significant impacts,and therefore,the project would not <br /> substantially contribute to any potential cumulative impacts for these topics. All environmental <br /> impacts that could occur as a result of the proposed project would be reduced to a less-than- <br /> sigmficant level through the implementation of the mitigation measures recommended in this <br /> document(see Mitigation Measures AIR-1,CUL-1,CUL-2,GEO-1,and HAZ-1). <br /> Implementation of these measures would ensure that the impacts of the project would be below <br /> established thresholds of significance and that these impacts would not combine with the impacts of <br /> other cumulative projects to result in a cumulatively considerable impact on the environment as a <br /> result of project development. Therefore,this impact would be less than significant. <br /> c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on <br /> human beings, either directly or indirectly?(No Impact) <br /> The proposed project would not result in any environmental effects that would cause substantial <br /> direct or indirect adverse effects to human beings. <br /> P:1RWC1401B Rocketship Sch-I\PRODUCrSUS-MND1Public\Ra ketship Public Review 09-29-16.docx(09/29/16)PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT 1 1 1 <br /> ATTY/RESO.0084/CC RESO ADOPTING CEQA-ROCKETSHIP CHARTER SCHOOL APPEAL <br /> REV:09-05-17 VR Page 119 of 124 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.